Literature DB >> 11693759

Unprotected left main coronary artery stenting: correlates of midterm survival and impact of patient selection.

A Black1, R Cortina, I Bossi, R Choussat, J Fajadet, J Marco.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The study served to present the in-hospital and six-month clinical outcome and also the long-term survival data of a consecutive series of patients undergoing stenting for unprotected left main coronary artery (LMCA) disease.
METHODS: Revascularization with coronary bypass surgery has been generally recommended for treatment of left main coronary stenosis. Improvements in angioplasty and coronary stent techniques and equipment may result in the wider applicability of a percutaneous approach. A total of 92 consecutive patients underwent unprotected LMCA stenting between March 1994 and December 1998. For the initial 39 patients (group I) angioplasty was performed only when surgical revascularization was contraindicated. The remaining 53 patients (group II) also included patients in whom surgery was feasible. Patients were followed for 7.3 +/- 5.8 months (median 239 days; range 49 to 1,477 days).
RESULTS: Compared to group I, group II patients had higher left ventricular ejection fraction (60 +/- 12% vs. 51 +/- 16%, p < 0.01), less severe LMCA stenosis (68 +/- 12% vs. 80 +/- 10%, p < 0.001), lower surgical risk score (13 +/- 7 vs. 20 +/- 7, p < 0.001), and had angioplasty more often performed via the radial approach (88% vs. 23%, p < 0.001) with smaller guiding catheters (6F: 49% vs. 15%; 8F: 2% vs. 77%, p < 0.001). The procedural success rate was 100%. In-hospital mortality was 4% (4 deaths, 3 cardiac). During follow-up there were six deaths, 13 patients required repeat percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (4 LMCA), and two required coronary artery bypass graft surgery. Estimated survival (+/- SEE) was 89 +/- 6.3% at 500 days and 85 +/- 12% at 1,000 days post-stenting. Overall mortality was 3.8% in group II and 20.5% in group I (p < 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Coronary stenting can be performed safely in high-risk individuals with acceptable intermediate-term outcome. It may be feasible to broaden the application of this technique in selected patients needing revascularization for left main coronary disease.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693759     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01176-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  24 in total

1.  Prediction of left main coronary artery obstruction by 12-lead electrocardiography: ST segment deviation in lead V6 greater than or equal to ST segment deviation in lead V1.

Authors:  Nitin Mahajan; Gerald Hollander; Deepak Thekkoott; Brian Temple; Bilal Malik; Sunil Abrol; David Yens; Jacob Shani; Edgar Lichstein
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 1.468

2.  Percutaneous coronary intervention for unprotected left main disease in very high risk patients: safety of drug-eluting stents.

Authors:  Martino Pepe; Massimo Napodano; Giuseppe Tarantini; Chiara Fraccaro; Ada Cutolo; Diletta Peluso; Giambattista Isabella; Angelo Ramondo; Sabino Iliceto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2010-10-21       Impact factor: 2.037

3.  Left main stem coronary disease: the case for percutaneous coronary intervention in a high risk patient with complex disease.

Authors:  K Kosuga; H Tamai
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training.

Authors:  K D Dawkins; T Gershlick; M de Belder; A Chauhan; G Venn; P Schofield; D Smith; J Watkins; H H Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Endovascular repair of symptomatic abdominal aortic aneurysm complicated by postoperative acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock.

Authors:  Stefan Brunner; Reinhard Kopp; Wolfgang-Michael Franz
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2007-02-26       Impact factor: 5.460

Review 6.  Utility of lead aVR for identifying the culprit lesion in acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Jørgen Tobias Kühl; Ronan M G Berg
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 1.468

Review 7.  Stenting versus surgery for significant left main disease.

Authors:  Ralf E Harskamp; Duk-Woo Park
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  PCI or CABG for severe unprotected left main coronary artery disease: making sense of the NOBLE and EXCEL trials.

Authors:  Anthony A Holmes; Sripal Bangalore
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2017-05       Impact factor: 2.895

9.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in left main disease: SYNTAX, PRECOMBAT, EXCEL and NOBLE-combined cardiology and cardiac surgery perspective.

Authors:  Duk-Woo Park; Jung-Min Ahn; Seung-Jung Park; David P Taggart
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2018-07

10.  Hemodynamic support with a percutaneous left ventricular assist device during stenting of an unprotected left main coronary artery.

Authors:  Biswajit Kar; Alexander Butkevich; Andrew B Civitello; Mohamad A Nawar; Brian Walton; Gregory N Messner; Igor D Gregoric; James Feldman; Timothy J Myers; Courtney Gemmato; Reynolds M Delgado
Journal:  Tex Heart Inst J       Date:  2004
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.