Literature DB >> 11693748

Prediction of mortality using dobutamine echocardiography.

T H Marwick1, C Case, S Sawada, C Rimmerman, P Brenneman, R Kovacs, L Short, M Lauer.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We sought to find out whether dobutamine echocardiography (DbE) could provide independent prediction of total and cardiac mortality, incremental to clinical and angiographic variables.
BACKGROUND: Existing outcome studies with DbE have examined composite end points, rather than death, over a relatively short follow-up. Clinical and stress data were collected in 3,156 patients (age 63 +/- 12 years, 1,801 men) undergoing DbE. Significant stenoses (>50% diameter) were identified in 70% of 1,073 patients undergoing coronary angiography. Total and cardiac mortality were identified over nine years of follow-up (mean 3.8 +/- 1.9). Cox models were used to analyze the effect of ischemia and other variables, independent of other determinants of mortality.
RESULTS: The dobutamine echocardiogram was abnormal in 1,575 patients (50%). Death occurred in 716 patients (23%), 259 of whom (8%) were thought to have died from cardiac causes. Patients with normal DbE had a total mortality of 8% per year and a cardiac mortality of 1% per year over the first four years of follow-up. Ischemia and the extent of abnormal wall motion were independent predictors of cardiac death, together with age and heart failure. In sequential Cox models, the predictive power of clinical data alone (model chi-square 115) was strengthened by adding the resting left ventricular function (model chi-square 138) and the results of DbE (model chi-square 181). In the subgroup undergoing coronary angiography, the power of the model was increased to a minor degree by the addition of coronary anatomy data.
CONCLUSIONS: Dobutamine echocardiography is an independent predictor of death, incremental to other data. While a normal dobutamine echocardiogram predicts low risk of cardiac death (on the order of 1% per year), this risk increases with the extent of abnormal wall motion at rest and stress.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11693748     DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)01191-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Cardiol        ISSN: 0735-1097            Impact factor:   24.094


  39 in total

Review 1.  Non-invasive imaging in coronary artery disease including anatomical and functional evaluation of ischaemia and viability assessment.

Authors:  M Pakkal; V Raj; G P McCann
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 2.  Stress echocardiography for the diagnosis and risk stratification of patients with suspected or known coronary artery disease: a critical appraisal. Supported by the British Society of Echocardiography.

Authors:  R Senior; M Monaghan; H Becher; J Mayet; P Nihoyannopoulos
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  Diagnostic and prognostic value of non-invasive imaging in known or suspected coronary artery disease.

Authors:  J D Schuijf; D Poldermans; L J Shaw; J W Jukema; H J Lamb; A de Roos; W Wijns; E E van der Wall; J J Bax
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 9.236

4.  Prognostic value of stress echocardiogram in patients with angiographically significant coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Siu-Sun Yao; Omar Wever-Pinzon; Xiaoqian Zhang; Sripal Bangalore; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  2011-10-21       Impact factor: 2.778

Review 5.  Physiologic risk assessment in stable ischemic heart disease: still superior to the anatomic angiographic approach.

Authors:  Alessia Gimelli; Paolo Marzullo; Daniele Rovai
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 6.  Stress echocardiography for the detection and assessment of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Nowell M Fine; Patricia A Pellikka
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Evaluating left ventricular systolic dysfunction: Stress echocardiography.

Authors:  Edgar Argulian; Farooq A Chaudhry
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2015-07-08       Impact factor: 5.952

8.  Pharmacological stress: a useful exercise?

Authors:  E E van der Wall
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 2.380

Review 9.  Role of myocardial perfusion imaging for risk stratification in suspected or known coronary artery disease.

Authors:  N K Sabharwal; A Lahiri
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 5.994

10.  Three dimensional first-pass myocardial perfusion imaging at 3T: feasibility study.

Authors:  Taehoon Shin; Houchun H Hu; Gerald M Pohost; Krishna S Nayak
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Magn Reson       Date:  2008-12-11       Impact factor: 5.364

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.