BACKGROUND: The sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive methods--specifically single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dipyridamole-thallium myocardial perfusion--for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis remains unclear. Occasionally, these patients present with atypical angina. Therefore, a CAD diagnosis must be excluded to prevent unnecessary cardiac catheterization. METHODS: To determine the diagnostic value of SPECT dipyridamole-thallium imaging in this population, we compared the effectiveness of the imaging procedure with that of coronary angiography by prospectively analyzing patients who underwent both procedures. Group 1 included 59 patients who were asymptomatic or had atypical angina; group 2; 51 preoperative aged-matched patients with typical angina. SPECT acquisition was performed 15 min after 0.142 mg/kg/min of dipyridamole infusion completion, and redistribution images were performed 4 h after thallium injection. Two cut-off values of luminal diameter narrowing, >50 and >70%, defined significant CAD. RESULTS: Coronary angiography with significant CAD (>50%) was present in 15 (25%) group 1 patients and in 16 (32%) group 2 patients (P=NS). The sensitivity was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (56 versus 26%; P=0.001). The specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy in the groups were similar. CAD of >70% luminal stenosis was present in 11 (19%) group 1 patients and in 12 (23%) group 2 patients (P=NS). The positive predictive value was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (75 versus 43%; P=0.001) but similar sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. The likelihood ratio for abnormal test increased in patients with CAD of >70%. CONCLUSIONS: symptoms of typical angina had significant impact on test sensitivity, positive predictive value and likelihood ratio for abnormal test. Furthermore, SPECT dipyridamole-thallium imaging was a useful non-invasive method to exclude the diagnosis of significant CAD (high specificity) in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis.
BACKGROUND: The sensitivity and specificity of non-invasive methods--specifically single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) dipyridamole-thallium myocardial perfusion--for detecting coronary artery disease (CAD) in patients with severe aortic stenosis remains unclear. Occasionally, these patients present with atypical angina. Therefore, a CAD diagnosis must be excluded to prevent unnecessary cardiac catheterization. METHODS: To determine the diagnostic value of SPECT dipyridamole-thallium imaging in this population, we compared the effectiveness of the imaging procedure with that of coronary angiography by prospectively analyzing patients who underwent both procedures. Group 1 included 59 patients who were asymptomatic or had atypical angina; group 2; 51 preoperative aged-matched patients with typical angina. SPECT acquisition was performed 15 min after 0.142 mg/kg/min of dipyridamole infusion completion, and redistribution images were performed 4 h after thallium injection. Two cut-off values of luminal diameter narrowing, >50 and >70%, defined significant CAD. RESULTS: Coronary angiography with significant CAD (>50%) was present in 15 (25%) group 1 patients and in 16 (32%) group 2 patients (P=NS). The sensitivity was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (56 versus 26%; P=0.001). The specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and accuracy in the groups were similar. CAD of >70% luminal stenosis was present in 11 (19%) group 1 patients and in 12 (23%) group 2 patients (P=NS). The positive predictive value was greater in group 2 than in group 1 (75 versus 43%; P=0.001) but similar sensitivity, specificity, negative predictive value, and accuracy. The likelihood ratio for abnormal test increased in patients with CAD of >70%. CONCLUSIONS: symptoms of typical angina had significant impact on test sensitivity, positive predictive value and likelihood ratio for abnormal test. Furthermore, SPECT dipyridamole-thallium imaging was a useful non-invasive method to exclude the diagnosis of significant CAD (high specificity) in asymptomatic and symptomatic patients with isolated severe aortic stenosis.
Authors: Milena J Henzlova; W Lane Duvall; Andrew J Einstein; Mark I Travin; Hein J Verberne Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-06 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Nasir Hussain; Waseem Chaudhry; Alan W Ahlberg; Richard S Amara; Ahmed Elfar; Matthew W Parker; John A Savino; Ruwanthi Titano; Milena J Henzlova; William L Duvall Journal: J Nucl Cardiol Date: 2016-03-15 Impact factor: 5.952
Authors: Attila Nemes; Tamás Forster; Attila Thury; Zsolt Kovács; Krisztina Boda; Miklós Csanády Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2003-10 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Jo M Zelis; Pim A L Tonino; Nico H J Pijls; Bernard De Bruyne; Richard L Kirkeeide; K Lance Gould; Nils P Johnson Journal: J Interv Cardiol Date: 2020-07-22 Impact factor: 2.279