Literature DB >> 11689993

Innovation and research in pediatric surgery.

J E Frader1, E Flanagan-Klygis.   

Abstract

Progress in pediatric surgery has relied primarily on the diffusion of innovations as reported in case series in the literature. The standards applied to clinical research that predominate in medical specialties have not become common in surgery, despite agreement that comparative trials produce the best evidence. Many pediatric surgical interventions compete with similar or even radically different surgical and medical approaches to the same condition. The resulting confusion about how to proceed raises serious ethical questions for physicians and families facing major decisions about surgery, medical therapy, or comfort care. Pediatric surgeons have a moral obligation to undertake formal research comparing their preferred operations to alternative approaches. Copyright 2001 by W.B. Saunders Company

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689993     DOI: 10.1053/spsu.2001.26841

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Pediatr Surg        ISSN: 1055-8586            Impact factor:   2.754


  4 in total

1.  The ethics of innovation. Should innovative surgery be exempt from clinical trials and regulations?

Authors:  Vicki Brower
Journal:  EMBO Rep       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 8.807

Review 2.  Outcomes of pediatric laparoscopic fundoplication: a critical review of the literature.

Authors:  Kathryn Martin; Catherine Deshaies; Sherif Emil
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2013-11-28

Review 3.  Innovative treatment as a precursor to clinical research.

Authors:  David Wendler; Seher Anjum; Peter Williamson
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 19.456

4.  Management of Primary Obstructive Megaureter by Endoscopic High-Pressure Balloon Dilatation. IDEAL Framework Model as a New Tool for Systematic Review.

Authors:  Rosa M Romero
Journal:  Front Surg       Date:  2019-04-16
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.