A S Lowe1, M D Walker, R Cowan, G D Baxter. 1. Rehabilitation Sciences Research Group, School of Health Sciences, University of Ulster at Jordanstown, Newtownabbey, Antrim, Northern Ireland. a.lowe@ulst.ac.uk
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography as a therapeutic agent in wound healing. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University animal laboratory. ANIMALS: Male BALB/c mice randomly allocated to 5 groups. INTERVENTIONS: In group 1, mice were left untreated; in groups 2 through 5, a well-defined area on the dorsum was exposed to 20Gy x-ray irradiation. Seventy-two hours postirradiation, all mice were anesthetized by inhalation (isoflurane anesthetic) and a 7 x 7mm area wound made on the dorsum. All wounds were videotaped alongside a marker scale 3 times weekly until closure was complete. Mice in groups 4 and 5 were treated with pulsed therapeutic ultrasound for 5 minutes, 3 times weekly at 1 and 3MHz, respectively (intensity, 0.5W/cm(2)); mice in group 3 received placebo ultrasound. Subsequently, the area of each wound was measured from video by using an image analysis system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Wound closure as a fraction of day zero. RESULTS: Irradiation caused a significant (p < .01) delay in the rate of wound closure by day 11. However, neither placebo ultrasound nor treatment at 1 or 3MHz affected the closure rate. CONCLUSION: These findings provide little evidence that 1 or 3MHz ultrasound applied to a radiation-impaired wound stimulates wound closure in mice. Copyright 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of ultrasonography as a therapeutic agent in wound healing. DESIGN: Randomized, controlled trial. SETTING: University animal laboratory. ANIMALS: Male BALB/c mice randomly allocated to 5 groups. INTERVENTIONS: In group 1, mice were left untreated; in groups 2 through 5, a well-defined area on the dorsum was exposed to 20Gy x-ray irradiation. Seventy-two hours postirradiation, all mice were anesthetized by inhalation (isoflurane anesthetic) and a 7 x 7mm area wound made on the dorsum. All wounds were videotaped alongside a marker scale 3 times weekly until closure was complete. Mice in groups 4 and 5 were treated with pulsed therapeutic ultrasound for 5 minutes, 3 times weekly at 1 and 3MHz, respectively (intensity, 0.5W/cm(2)); mice in group 3 received placebo ultrasound. Subsequently, the area of each wound was measured from video by using an image analysis system. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Wound closure as a fraction of day zero. RESULTS: Irradiation caused a significant (p < .01) delay in the rate of wound closure by day 11. However, neither placebo ultrasound nor treatment at 1 or 3MHz affected the closure rate. CONCLUSION: These findings provide little evidence that 1 or 3MHz ultrasound applied to a radiation-impaired wound stimulates wound closure in mice. Copyright 2001 by the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine and the American Academy of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation