Literature DB >> 11689797

Implications of increased left ventricular mass index on in-hospital outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve surgery.

R H Mehta1, D Bruckman, S Das, T Tsai, P Russman, D Karavite, H Monaghan, S Sonnad, M J Shea, K A Eagle, G M Deeb.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Increased left ventricular mass index has been shown to be associated with higher mortality in epidemiologic studies. However, the effect of increased left ventricular mass index on outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement is unknown.
METHODS: We studied 473 consecutive patients undergoing elective aortic valve replacement to assess the influence of left ventricular mass index on outcomes in patients having this procedure. Echocardiographic left ventricular dimensions were used to calculate left ventricular mass index (considered increased if >134 g/m(2) in male patients and >110 g/m(2) in female patients).
RESULTS: Left ventricular mass index was increased in 24% of patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Postprocedural complications (respiratory failure, renal insufficiency, congestive heart failure, and atrial and ventricular arrhythmias), length of stay in the intensive care unit, and in-hospital mortality were increased in patients with increased left ventricular mass index. Multivariable analysis identified prior valve surgery (odds ratio, 4.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-15.7; P =.030), left ventricular ejection fraction (odds ratio, 1.07; 95% confidence interval, 1.01-1.14; P =.020), history of hypertension (odds ratio, 8.2; 95% confidence interval, 2.2-30.4; P =.002), history of liver disease (odds ratio, 50.4; 95% confidence interval, 4.2-609.0; P =.002), and increased left ventricular mass index (odds ratio, 38; 95% confidence interval, 9.3-154.1; P <.001) as independent predictors of in-hospital mortality. Furthermore, low output syndrome was identified as the most common mode of death (36%) after aortic valve replacement in patients with increased left ventricular mass index.
CONCLUSIONS: Increased left ventricular mass index is associated with increased adverse in-hospital clinical outcomes in patients undergoing aortic valve replacement. Although this finding warrants special modification in perioperative management, further studies are needed to address whether outcomes in asymptomatic patients with aortic valve disease could be improved by earlier aortic valve replacement before a significant increase in left ventricular mass index.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689797     DOI: 10.1067/mtc.2001.116558

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  21 in total

Review 1.  A 44-year experience of prosthetic heart valve implantation at Niigata University Hospital.

Authors:  Jun-ichi Hayashi
Journal:  J Artif Organs       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 1.731

2.  What influences the outcome of valve replacement in critical aortic stenosis?

Authors:  H Baumgartner
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 3.  A review of the application of propensity score methods yielded increasing use, advantages in specific settings, but not substantially different estimates compared with conventional multivariable methods.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Manisha Joshi; Robert J Glynn; Jerry Avorn; Kenneth J Rothman; Sebastian Schneeweiss
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10-13       Impact factor: 6.437

Review 4.  Heart valve surgery today: indications, operative technique, and selected aspects of postoperative care in acquired valvular heart disease.

Authors:  Hans Joachim Geissler; Christian Schlensak; Michael Südkamp; Friedhelm Beyersdorf
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2009-03-27       Impact factor: 5.594

5.  Effects of phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibition on systemic and pulmonary hemodynamics and ventricular function in patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Alan Zajarias; José A Madrazo; Jay Shah; Brian F Gage; Eric Novak; Stephanie N Johnson; Murali M Chakinala; Tara A Hohn; Mohammed Saghir; Douglas L Mann
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2012-03-25       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Patterns of left ventricular remodeling in aortic stenosis: therapeutic implications.

Authors:  Sammy Elmariah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-07

7.  The Early Bird Catches the Worm: Should Severe LVH Be an Indication for Early TAVR?

Authors:  Deepak L Bhatt; Anubodh S Varshney
Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 11.195

8.  Heterogeneity of systolic dysfunction in patients with severe aortic stenosis and preserved ejection fraction.

Authors:  Brian R Lindman; Qi Liu; Brian P Cupps; Pamela K Woodard; Eric Novak; Anna M Vatterott; Danielle J Koerner; Kevin Kulshrestha; Michael K Pasque
Journal:  J Card Surg       Date:  2017-08       Impact factor: 1.620

9.  Tricuspid regurgitation and right ventricular function after mitral valve surgery with or without concomitant tricuspid valve procedure.

Authors:  Ravi R Desai; Lina Maria Vargas Abello; Allan L Klein; Thomas H Marwick; Richard A Krasuski; Ying Ye; Edward R Nowicki; Jeevanantham Rajeswaran; Eugene H Blackstone; Gösta B Pettersson
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 5.209

10.  Valvular endothelial cells and the mechanoregulation of valvular pathology.

Authors:  Jonathan T Butcher; Robert M Nerem
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 6.237

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.