Literature DB >> 11689714

Self-expanding stents for carotid interventions: comparison of nitinol versus stainless-steel stents.

D Mukherjee1, V Kalahasti, M Roffi, D L Bhatt, S R Kapadia, C Bajzer, J Reginelli, K M Ziada, K Hughes, J S Yadav.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Angioplasty and stenting are becoming increasingly accepted techniques for the treatment of carotid stenosis. However, the optimal stent for carotid intervention is not known.
METHODS: We compared the short- and intermediate-term results of carotid stenting using either nitinol or stainless-steel self-expanding stents in 178 high surgical risk patients undergoing carotid stenting at our institution. Of these 178 patients, eighty-nine received stainless-steel stents and 89 received nitinol stents. The groups were similar with respect to age, gender, diabetes, hypertension, left ventricular function, and symptom status. There were more patients with contralateral carotid occlusion in the nitinol stent group. Independent neurological evaluation was performed in all patients pre- and post-carotid stenting.
RESULTS: At 6 months, there was a similar incidence of stroke (3.3% versus 2.2%) in the stainless-steel group and nitinol stent group, respectively. There was higher 6-month mortality noted in the stainless-steel stent group, but there were no neurological deaths in either group.
CONCLUSIONS: In a single-center patient cohort with similar baseline characteristics, patients receiving nitinol stents and stainless-steel stents had similar neurological outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Invasive Cardiol        ISSN: 1042-3931            Impact factor:   2.022


  6 in total

1.  Conformity of carotid stents with vascular anatomy: evaluation in carotid models.

Authors:  Norimitsu Tanaka; Jean-Baptiste Martin; Koji Tokunaga; Toshi Abe; Yusuke Uchiyama; Naofumi Hayabuchi; Joachim Berkefeld; Daniel A Rüfenacht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Therapeutic advances in interventional neurology.

Authors:  Jawad F Kirmani; Nazli Janjua; Ammar Al Kawi; Shafiuddin Ahmed; Ismail Khatri; Ali Ebrahimi; Afshin A Divani; Adnan I Qureshi
Journal:  NeuroRx       Date:  2005-04

Review 3.  Stents for intracranial wide-necked aneurysms: more than mechanical protection.

Authors:  Isabel Wanke; Michael Forsting
Journal:  Neuroradiology       Date:  2008-09-20       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 4.  The development of carotid stent material.

Authors:  Dongsheng He; Wenhua Liu; Tao Zhang
Journal:  Interv Neurol       Date:  2015-03

5.  Prospective randomized trial comparing a nitinol self-expanding coronary stent with low-pressure dilatation and a high-pressure balloon expandable bare metal stent.

Authors:  Shinichiro Tanaka; Sachiro Watanabe; Hitoshi Matsuo; Tomonori Segawa; Makoto Iwama; Takeshi Hirose; Haruki Takahashi; Koji Ono; Shunichiro Warita; Tai Kojima; Shinya Minatoguchi; Hisayoshi Fujiwara
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2008-02-14       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Comparison of short-term outcomes after carotid artery stenting according to different stent designs.

Authors:  Muslum Sahin; Göksel Açar; Birol Ozkan; Gökhan Alıcı; Mehmet Vefik Yazıcıoglu; Mustafa Bulut; Mehmet Emin Kalkan; Serdar Demir; Rezzan Deniz Acar; Bilal Boztosun
Journal:  Postepy Kardiol Interwencyjnej       Date:  2013-06-17       Impact factor: 1.426

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.