Literature DB >> 11689306

Are different kinds of acoustic features processed differently for speech and non-speech sounds?

M Jaramillo1, T Ilvonen, T Kujala, P Alku, M Tervaniemi, K Alho.   

Abstract

This study examined how changes in different types of acoustic features are processed in the brain for both speech and non-speech sounds. Event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded in native Finnish speakers presented with sequences of repetitive vowels (/e/) or complex harmonical tones interspersed with infrequent changes in duration, frequency and either a vowel change (/o/ for vowel sequences) or a double deviant (frequency+duration change for tone sequences). The stimuli were presented monaurally in separate blocks to either the left or right ear. The results showed that speech stimuli were more efficiently processed than harmonical tones as reflected by an enhanced mismatch negativity (MMN) and P3a ERP components. In addition, the duration change in vowels elicited a larger MMN component than the equivalent change in tones. This result might reflect enhanced processing of duration features in the Finnish language in which phoneme duration plays a critical role.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11689306     DOI: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00081-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res        ISSN: 0926-6410


  6 in total

1.  Plasticity of the human auditory cortex induced by discrimination learning of non-native, mora-timed contrasts of the Japanese language.

Authors:  Hans Menning; Satoshi Imaizumi; Pienie Zwitserlood; Christo Pantev
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2002 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

2.  The effects of visual material and temporal synchrony on the processing of letters and speech sounds.

Authors:  Maria Mittag; Rika Takegata; Teija Kujala
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-04-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Children's weighting strategies for word-final stop voicing are not explained by auditory sensitivities.

Authors:  Susan Nittrouer; Joanna H Lowenstein
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Native language experience influences the topography of the mismatch negativity to speech.

Authors:  Jason D Zevin; Hia Datta; Urs Maurer; Kara A Rosania; Bruce D McCandliss
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2010-11-17       Impact factor: 3.169

5.  Auditory discrimination predicts linguistic outcome in Italian infants with and without familial risk for language learning impairment.

Authors:  Chiara Cantiani; Valentina Riva; Caterina Piazza; Roberta Bettoni; Massimo Molteni; Naseem Choudhury; Cecilia Marino; April A Benasich
Journal:  Dev Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-24       Impact factor: 6.464

6.  A hierarchy of event-related potential markers of auditory processing in disorders of consciousness.

Authors:  Steve Beukema; Laura E Gonzalez-Lara; Paola Finoia; Evelyn Kamau; Judith Allanson; Srivas Chennu; Raechelle M Gibson; John D Pickard; Adrian M Owen; Damian Cruse
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2016-08-04       Impact factor: 4.881

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.