BACKGROUND: The exact role of factors such as serum lipids, body mass index and (micro-)albuminuria as possible determinants of diabetic retinopathy remains to be determined. We have scrutinized the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and its concomitants in terms of risk factors and other diabetic complications in newly diagnosed diabetic patients. METHODS: A population-based sample of 1,251 newly diagnosed diabetic patients aged 40 years or over was established in general practice. Median age was 65.3 years. Funduscopy was performed by practising ophthalmologists. Blood and urine analyses were centralised. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 5.0%. Only three patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. As expected, diabetic retinopathy and renal involvement, as expressed by the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. were strongly positively associated. An intriguing finding was that of an inverse relationship between fasting triglycerides and diabetic retinopathy, an association that proved to be confined to microalbuminuric patients. An inverse association between body mass index and diabetic retinopathy was found only univariately. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of diabetic retinopathy cannot be explained by the screening method alone, but rather by early detection of diabetes in a non-selective patient sample. It seems that renal involvement modifies the expected relationship between diabetic retinopathy and triglycerides, but a pathophysiological mechanism is not available.
BACKGROUND: The exact role of factors such as serum lipids, body mass index and (micro-)albuminuria as possible determinants of diabetic retinopathy remains to be determined. We have scrutinized the prevalence of diabetic retinopathy and its concomitants in terms of risk factors and other diabetic complications in newly diagnosed diabeticpatients. METHODS: A population-based sample of 1,251 newly diagnosed diabeticpatients aged 40 years or over was established in general practice. Median age was 65.3 years. Funduscopy was performed by practising ophthalmologists. Blood and urine analyses were centralised. RESULTS: The overall prevalence of diabetic retinopathy was 5.0%. Only three patients had proliferative diabetic retinopathy. As expected, diabetic retinopathy and renal involvement, as expressed by the urinary albumin/creatinine ratio. were strongly positively associated. An intriguing finding was that of an inverse relationship between fasting triglycerides and diabetic retinopathy, an association that proved to be confined to microalbuminuric patients. An inverse association between body mass index and diabetic retinopathy was found only univariately. CONCLUSION: The low prevalence of diabetic retinopathy cannot be explained by the screening method alone, but rather by early detection of diabetes in a non-selective patient sample. It seems that renal involvement modifies the expected relationship between diabetic retinopathy and triglycerides, but a pathophysiological mechanism is not available.
Authors: Aravind Sosale; K M Prasanna Kumar; S M Sadikot; Anant Nigam; Sarita Bajaj; A H Zargar; S K Singh Journal: Indian J Endocrinol Metab Date: 2014-05