Literature DB >> 11687695

Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy.

W A Berg1, C L Arnoldus, E Teferra, M Bhargavan.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the pathologic outcome of amorphous breast calcifications and the success of stereotactic biopsy for such lesions.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: From July 1995 through February 2000, biopsy of all clustered amorphous calcifications not clearly stable for at least 5 years or in a diffuse scattered distribution was recommended. Logistic regression analysis was used to stratify the risk of malignancy by patient risk factors, calcification distribution, and stability.
RESULTS: Calcifications were retrieved from 150 biopsies; 30 (20%) proved malignant and included 27 ductal carcinomas in situ and three low-grade invasive and intraductal carcinomas (2-5 mm). Another 30 (20%) yielded high-risk lesions, including 21 atypical ductal hyperplasia, eight atypical lobular hyperplasia, and one lobular carcinoma in situ. In 150 lesions, stereotactic biopsy was performed on 113 and aborted in 10. Calcifications were retrieved from all 113 stereotactic biopsies. Of those with calcification retrieval, there were three histologic underestimates (accuracy, 97%). Stereotactic biopsy spared a surgical procedure in 57 (46%) of 123 patients. Needle localization was required for 23 (15%) of 150 patients due to poor conspicuity. Five (45%) of 11 biopsies performed in women with ipsilateral breast cancer showed malignancy (P = .025). When multiple lesions of amorphous calcifications were present in one breast, sampling of one reliably predicted the outcome of others.
CONCLUSION: We found a substantial rate of ductal carcinoma in situ and high-risk lesions associated with amorphous calcifications. Stereotactic biopsy can be successfully performed for the majority of subtle amorphous calcifications; however, only a minority were spared a surgical procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687695     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2212010164

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  20 in total

Review 1.  Imaging for the diagnosis and management of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr       Date:  2010

2.  Detection of simulated microcalcifications in a phantom with digital mammography: effect of pixel size.

Authors:  Sankararaman Suryanarayanan; Andrew Karellas; Srinivasan Vedantham; Ioannis Sechopoulos; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-05-23       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  [Diagnostics of microcalcifications from minimally invasive biopsies in mammography screening: results from the prevalence phase].

Authors:  D Hungermann; S Weigel; E Korsching; W Heindel; W Böcker; T Decker
Journal:  Pathologe       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.011

4.  Evaluation of breast amorphous calcifications by a computer-aided detection system in full-field digital mammography.

Authors:  A M Scaranelo; R Eiada; K Bukhanov; P Crystal
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.039

5.  Comparing Mammography Abnormality Features to Genetic Variants in the Prediction of Breast Cancer in Women Recommended for Breast Biopsy.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Jie Liu; Yirong Wu; Adedayo A Onitilo; Catherine A McCarty; C David Page; Peggy L Peissig; Amy Trentham-Dietz; Terrie Kitchner; Jun Fan; Ming Yuan
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.173

6.  Artificial intelligence computer-aided detection enhances synthesized mammograms: comparison with original digital mammograms alone and in combination with tomosynthesis images in an experimental setting.

Authors:  Takayoshi Uematsu; Kazuaki Nakashima; Taiyo Leopoldo Harada; Hatsuko Nasu; Tatsuya Igarashi
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2022-08-24       Impact factor: 3.307

7.  The ACR BI-RADS experience: learning from history.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Edward A Sickles; Lawrence W Bassett; Daniel L Rubin; Carol H Lee; Debra M Ikeda; Ellen B Mendelson; Pamela A Wilcox; Priscilla F Butler; Carl J D'Orsi
Journal:  J Am Coll Radiol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 5.532

8.  The association between mammographic calcifications and breast cancer prognostic factors in a population-based registry cohort.

Authors:  Sarah J Nyante; Sheila S Lee; Thad S Benefield; Tiffany N Hoots; Louise M Henderson
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Breast microcalcifications: the UK RCR 5-point breast imaging system or BI-RADS; which is the better predictor of malignancy?

Authors:  Linda Metaxa; Nuala A Healy; Sylvia A O'Keeffe
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2019-08-09       Impact factor: 3.039

10.  2D or Synthetic 2D? A Reader Study of Visualization of Amorphous Calcifications.

Authors:  Andrew Renaldo; Matthew Miller; Matthew Caley; Ramapriya Ganti; James Patrie; Carrie Rochman; Jonathan V Nguyen
Journal:  J Breast Imaging       Date:  2022-01-20
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.