Literature DB >> 11687673

Cervical spine: postmortem assessment of accident injuries--comparison of radiographic, MR imaging, anatomic, and pathologic findings.

A Stäbler1, J Eck, R Penning, S P Milz, R Bartl, D Resnick, M Reiser.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the ability of postmortem radiography and magnetic resonance (MR) imaging to depict occult cervical spine injuries as compared with anatomic and pathologic findings.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cervical spines of 10 adult accident victims underwent radiography and MR imaging, with T1-weighted, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and four gradient-echo pulse sequences. The frozen specimens were cut into 3-mm-thick slices (sagittal plane) and photographed, and microfocus radiographs were obtained. Imaging findings were compared with the anatomic and pathologic findings.
RESULTS: Eight of the 10 specimens had 28 posttraumatic lesions: three fractures (two missed at the initial MR imaging reading), 10 facet joint capsule lesions with bleeding, five soft-tissue and ligament lesions, eight disk lesions, and two spinal cord lesions. Radiography depicted one lesion (4%). Two partial ruptures of the anterior annulus fibrosus were depicted at only MR imaging. Initially, 11 of 28 lesions were detected on MR images; retrospectively, 17 of 28 lesions were correlated with anatomic findings.
CONCLUSION: Soft-tissue and intervertebral disk and ligament injuries account for 89% (25 of 28) of posttraumatic cervical spine lesions detected on postmortem images. Occult lesions, including apophyseal joint injuries, were found in clinically noninjured cervical spines. MR imaging was limited in the depiction of discrete lesions when T1-weighted non-fat-saturated, fast spin-echo T2-weighted, and gradient-echo pulse sequences were used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687673     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2212010336

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  6 in total

1.  Soft tissue injury protocol (STIP) using motion MRI for cervical spine trauma assessment.

Authors:  Vincenzo Giuliano; Concetta Giuliano; Fabio Pinto; Mariano Scaglione
Journal:  Emerg Radiol       Date:  2004-03-19

2.  [Evidence based diagnostic procedures for the determination of suspected blunt cervical spine injuries. Development of an algorithm].

Authors:  B A Leidel; K-G Kanz; W Mutschler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 1.000

3.  Cervical Radiculopathy due to Cervical Degenerative Diseases : Anatomy, Diagnosis and Treatment.

Authors:  Kyoung-Tae Kim; Young-Baeg Kim
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2010-12-31

4.  Postmortem multislice computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging of odontoid fractures, atlantoaxial distractions and ascending medullary edema.

Authors:  Kathrin Yen; Martin Sonnenschein; Michael J Thali; Christof Ozdoba; Joachim Weis; Karin Zwygart; Emin Aghayev; Christian Jackowski; Richard Dirnhofer
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2005-01-12       Impact factor: 2.686

5.  Imaging of cervical spine injuries in athletes.

Authors:  Eric A Bogner
Journal:  Sports Health       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.843

Review 6.  What should an ideal spinal injury classification system consist of? A methodological review and conceptual proposal for future classifications.

Authors:  Joost J van Middendorp; Laurent Audigé; Beate Hanson; Jens R Chapman; Allard J F Hosman
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2010-05-13       Impact factor: 3.134

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.