PURPOSE: To delineate with computed tomography (CT) the anatomic regions containing the supraclavicular (SCV) and infraclavicular (IFV) nodal groups, to define the course of the brachial plexus, to estimate the actual radiation dose received by these regions in a series of patients treated in the traditional manner, and to compare these doses to those received with an optimized dosimetric technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients underwent contrast material-enhanced CT for the purpose of radiation therapy planning. CT scans were used to study the location of the SCV and IFV nodal regions by using outlining of readily identifiable anatomic structures that define the nodal groups. The brachial plexus was also outlined by using similar methods. Radiation therapy doses to the SCV and IFV were then estimated by using traditional dose calculations and optimized planning. A repeated measures analysis of covariance was used to compare the SCV and IFV depths and to compare the doses achieved with the traditional and optimized methods. RESULTS: Coverage by the 90% isodose surface was significantly decreased with traditional planning versus conformal planning as the depth to the SCV nodes increased (P < .001). Significantly decreased coverage by using the 90% isodose surface was demonstrated for traditional planning versus conformal planning with increasing IFV depth (P = .015). A linear correlation was found between brachial plexus depth and SCV depth up to 7 cm. CONCLUSION: Conformal optimized planning provided improved dosimetric coverage compared with standard techniques.
PURPOSE: To delineate with computed tomography (CT) the anatomic regions containing the supraclavicular (SCV) and infraclavicular (IFV) nodal groups, to define the course of the brachial plexus, to estimate the actual radiation dose received by these regions in a series of patients treated in the traditional manner, and to compare these doses to those received with an optimized dosimetric technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty patients underwent contrast material-enhanced CT for the purpose of radiation therapy planning. CT scans were used to study the location of the SCV and IFV nodal regions by using outlining of readily identifiable anatomic structures that define the nodal groups. The brachial plexus was also outlined by using similar methods. Radiation therapy doses to the SCV and IFV were then estimated by using traditional dose calculations and optimized planning. A repeated measures analysis of covariance was used to compare the SCV and IFV depths and to compare the doses achieved with the traditional and optimized methods. RESULTS: Coverage by the 90% isodose surface was significantly decreased with traditional planning versus conformal planning as the depth to the SCV nodes increased (P < .001). Significantly decreased coverage by using the 90% isodose surface was demonstrated for traditional planning versus conformal planning with increasing IFV depth (P = .015). A linear correlation was found between brachial plexus depth and SCV depth up to 7 cm. CONCLUSION: Conformal optimized planning provided improved dosimetric coverage compared with standard techniques.
Authors: Y M Kirova; P Castro Pena; R Dendale; V Servois; M A Bollet; N Fournier-Bidoz; F Campana; A Fourquet Journal: Br J Radiol Date: 2009-12-17 Impact factor: 3.039
Authors: M-L Sautter-Bihl; F Sedlmayer; W Budach; J Dunst; P Feyer; R Fietkau; C Fussl; W Haase; W Harms; M D Piroth; R Souchon; F Wenz; R Sauer Journal: Strahlenther Onkol Date: 2014-03-05 Impact factor: 3.621
Authors: Giuseppe Carlo Iorio; Pierfrancesco Franco; Elena Gallio; Stefania Martini; Francesca Arcadipane; Sara Bartoncini; Nadia Rondi; Francesca Romana Giglioli; Ada Ala; Mario Airoldi; Michela Donadio; Corrado De Sanctis; Isabella Castellano; Umberto Ricardi Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2017-11-24 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Reshma Jagsi; Jean Moran; Robin Marsh; Kathryn Masi; Kent A Griffith; Lori J Pierce Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2010-09-09 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Valerie K Reed; Jose L Cavalcanti; Eric A Strom; George H Perkins; Julia L Oh; Welela Tereffe; Tse-Kuan Yu; Henry Yeung; Gary J Whitman; Isabelle Bedrosian; Homer A Macapinlac; Thomas A Buchholz; Wendy A Woodward Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-12-31 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Alexander Lin; Jean M Moran; Robin B Marsh; James M Balter; Benedick A Fraass; Daniel L McShan; Marc L Kessler; Lori J Pierce Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2008-10-01 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Raweewan Liengsawangwong; Tse-Kuan Yu; Tzouh-Liang Sun; Jeremy J Erasmus; George H Perkins; Welela Tereffe; Julia L Oh; Wendy A Woodward; Eric A Strom; Mohammad Salephour; Thomas A Buchholz Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2007-11-01 Impact factor: 7.038