Literature DB >> 11687383

Pfiesteria: review of the science and identification of research gaps. Report for the National Center for Environmental Health, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

J Samet1, G S Bignami, R Feldman, W Hawkins, J Neff, T Smayda.   

Abstract

In connection with the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria, a multidisciplinary panel evaluated Pfiesteria-related research. The panel set out what was known and what was not known about adverse effects of the organism on estuarine ecology, fish, and human health; assessed the methods used in Pfiesteria research; and offered suggestions to address data gaps. The panel's expertise covered dinoflagellate ecology; fish pathology and toxicology; laboratory measurement of toxins, epidemiology, and neurology. The panel evaluated peer-reviewed and non-peer-reviewed literature available through June 2000 in a systematic conceptual framework that moved from the source of exposure, through exposure research and dose, to human health effects. Substantial uncertainties remain throughout the conceptual framework the panel used to guide its evaluation. Firm evidence demonstrates that Pfiesteria is toxic to fish, but the specific toxin has not been isolated or characterized. Laboratory and field evidence indicate that the organism has a complex life cycle. The consequences of human exposure to Pfiesteria toxin and the magnitude of the human health problem remain obscure. The patchwork of approaches used in clinical evaluation and surrogate measures of exposure to the toxin are major limitations of this work. To protect public health, the panel suggests that priority be given research that will provide better insight into the effects of Pfiesteria on human health. Key gaps include the identity and mechanism of action of the toxin(s), the incomplete description of effects of exposure in invertebrates, fish, and humans, and the nature and extent of exposures that place people at risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687383      PMCID: PMC1240594          DOI: 10.1289/ehp.01109s5639

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Health Perspect        ISSN: 0091-6765            Impact factor:   9.031


  39 in total

Review 1.  Pfiesteria: harmful algal blooms as indicators of human: ecosystem interactions.

Authors:  E K Silbergeld; L Grattan; D Oldach; J G Morris
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 6.498

2.  Parasitic, amoeboid dinoflagellates.

Authors:  L A Pfiester; J Popovský
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1979-05-31       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Surveillance for possible estuary-associated syndrome--six states, 1998-1999.

Authors: 
Journal:  MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep       Date:  2000-05-05       Impact factor: 17.586

Review 4.  The polymerase chain reaction: from functional genomics to high-school practical classes.

Authors:  G R Taylor; P Robinson
Journal:  Curr Opin Biotechnol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 9.740

5.  The influence of vision on computerized neurobehavioral test scores: a proposal for improving test protocols.

Authors:  H K Hudnell; D A Otto; D E House
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1996 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.763

6.  Fish lesions in the Chesapeake Bay: Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates and other etiologies.

Authors:  A S Kane; D Oldach; R Reimschuessel
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1998-05

7.  Pfiesteria in Maryland: preliminary epidemiologic findings.

Authors:  J E Golub; D T Haselow; J C Hageman; A S Lopez; D W Oldach; L M Grattan; T M Perl
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1998-05

8.  Pfiesteria toxin and learning performance.

Authors:  E D Levin; B B Simon; D E Schmechel; H B Glasgow; N J Deamer-Melia; J M Burkholder; V C Moser; K Jensen; G J Harry
Journal:  Neurotoxicol Teratol       Date:  1999 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.763

9.  Diagnosis of Pfiesteria-human illness syndrome.

Authors:  R C Shoemaker
Journal:  Md Med J       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec

10.  Learning and memory difficulties after environmental exposure to waterways containing toxin-producing Pfiesteria or Pfiesteria-like dinoflagellates.

Authors:  L M Grattan; D Oldach; T M Perl; M H Lowitt; D L Matuszak; C Dickson; C Parrott; R C Shoemaker; C L Kauffman; M P Wasserman; J R Hebel; P Charache; J G Morris
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1998-08-15       Impact factor: 79.321

View more
  5 in total

1.  Demonstration of toxicity to fish and to mammalian cells by Pfiesteria species: comparison of assay methods and strains.

Authors:  Joann M Burkholder; Andrew S Gordon; Peter D Moeller; J Mac Law; Kathryn J Coyne; Alan J Lewitus; John S Ramsdell; Harold G Marshall; Nora J Deamer; S Craig Cary; Jason W Kempton; Steven L Morton; Parke A Rublee
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-02-22       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Discovery of the toxic dinoflagellate Pfiesteria in northern European waters.

Authors:  Kjetill S Jakobsen; Torstein Tengs; Andreas Vatne; Holly A Bowers; David W Oldach; JoAnn M Burkholder; Howard B Glasgow; Parke A Rublee; Dag Klaveness
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2002-01-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Emerging areas of research reported during the CDC National Conference on Pfiesteria: from biology to public health.

Authors:  C Rubin; M A McGeehin; A K Holmes; L Backer; G Burreson; M C Earley; D Griffith; R Levine; W Litaker; J Mei; L Naeher; L Needham; E Noga; M Poli; H S Rogers
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

4.  Species of the toxic Pfiesteria complex, and the importance of functional type in data interpretation.

Authors:  J M Burkholder; H B Glasgow; N J Deamer-Melia; J Springer; M W Parrow; C Zhang; P J Cancellieri
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 9.031

5.  Lack of evidence for contact sensitization by Pfiesteria extract.

Authors:  Rachel M Patterson; Edward Noga; Dori Germolec
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2007-07       Impact factor: 9.031

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.