Literature DB >> 11687152

Concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy for cancer of the uterine cervix.

J Green1, J Kirwan, J Tierney, P Symonds, L Fresco, C Williams, M Collingwood.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The National Cancer Institute (USA) alert in February 1999 stated that concomitant chemoradiotherapy should be considered for all patients with cervical cancer, based on evidence from five randomised controlled trials.
OBJECTIVES: To review all known randomised clinical controlled trials (RCTs) comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiation therapy with radiotherapy for locally advanced cervical cancer. SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched electronic databases, trials registers and reference lists of published trial reports and review articles were also searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: This review includes RCTs in cervical cancer comparing concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy with radiotherapy. In the experimental arm, further adjuvant chemotherapy was allowable. Hydroxyurea was considered inactive and allowable. Trials using radiosensitisers or radioprotectors in the experimental arm were excluded. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors reviewed trials for inclusion and extracted data. For meta-analyses of time-to-event outcomes (survival, progression-free survival), a hazard ratio (HR) was extracted or estimated from trial reports, where possible. Only overall rates of local and distant recurrence were presented in many reports so only an odds ratios (OR) of recurrence rates could be calculated, which takes no account of time to recurrence or censoring. The HRs and ORs for individual trials were combined across all trials, using the fixed effect model. Few trials reported acute toxicity adequately. Data were therefore grouped and the number of toxic events was used to calculate a single OR for each site and grade. Late toxicity was rarely described so could only be reviewed qualitatively. MAIN
RESULTS: Nineteen trials (17 published, two unpublished) were identified including 4580 patients, although due to patient exclusion and differential reporting 62-78% were available for the various analyses. The review strongly suggests chemoradiation improves overall survival and progression free survival, whether platinum was used or not with absolute benefits of 12% and 16% respectively. There was, however, statistical heterogeneity for these outcomes There was some evidence that the effect was greater in trials including a high proportion of stage I and II patients. Chemoradiation also showed significant benefit for both local and distant recurrence. Haematological and gastrointestinal toxicity was significantly greater in the concomitant chemoradiation group. Details of late morbidity were sparse. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Concomitant chemotherapy and radiotherapy appears to improve overall survival and progression-free survival in locally advanced cervical cancer. It also reduces local and distant recurrence suggesting concomitant chemotherapy may afford cytotoxic and sensitisation effects. Some acute toxicity is increased, but data on long term side effects were sparse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687152     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002225

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  8 in total

Review 1.  Twenty-first century cervical cancer management: A historical perspective of the gynecologic oncology group/NRG oncology over the past twenty years.

Authors:  Charles A Leath; Bradley J Monk
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.482

2.  A phase I study of concurrent weekly topotecan and cisplatin chemotherapy with whole pelvic radiation therapy in locally advanced cervical cancer: a gynecologic oncology group study.

Authors:  Peter G Rose; Michael W Sill; D Scott McMeekin; Amina Ahmed; Ritu Salani; S Diane Yamada; Aaron H Wolfson; Nancy Fusco; Paula M Fracasso
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2011-12-22       Impact factor: 5.482

3.  Evaluation of toxicity of surgery and/or chemoirradiation treatment of uterine cervix cancer.

Authors:  V Tormo Ferrero; F J Andreu Martínez; R Cardenal Maciá
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 3.405

Review 4.  History and Updates of the GROINSS-V Studies.

Authors:  Marise M Wagner; Ate G J van der Zee; Maaike H M Oonk
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-13       Impact factor: 6.575

5.  Comparison of concurrent chemoradiation therapy with weekly cisplatin versus monthly fluorouracil plus cisplatin in FIGO stage IIB-IVA cervical cancer.

Authors:  Tae Wook Kong; Suk-Joon Chang; Jiheum Paek; Seung-Chul Yoo; Jong-Hyuck Yoon; Ki-Hong Chang; Mison Chun; Hee-Sug Ryu
Journal:  J Gynecol Oncol       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 4.401

6.  The value of prognostic factors for uterine cervical cancer patients treated with irradiation alone.

Authors:  Rūta Grigiene; Konstantinas P Valuckas; Eduardas Aleknavicius; Juozas Kurtinaitis; Simona R Letautiene
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2007-12-22       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 7.  Targeting the AKT pathway: Repositioning HIV protease inhibitors as radiosensitizers.

Authors:  Jayant S Goda; Tejaswini Pachpor; Trinanjan Basu; Supriya Chopra; Vikram Gota
Journal:  Indian J Med Res       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 2.375

8.  Synergistic locoregional chemoradiotherapy using a composite liposome-in-gel system as an injectable drug depot.

Authors:  Shruti GuhaSarkar; Kamal Pathak; Niyati Sudhalkar; Prachi More; Jayant Sastri Goda; Vikram Gota; Rinti Banerjee
Journal:  Int J Nanomedicine       Date:  2016-12-01
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.