Literature DB >> 11687144

Ticlopidine versus oral anticoagulation for coronary stenting.

B Cosmi1, A Rubboli, C Castelvetri, M Milandri.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A 2-4 week course of ticlopidine plus aspirin following coronary stenting is considered effective in preventing thrombotic occlusion of the stented vessel and safe in regards to bleeding and peripheral vascular complications. However, rare, although potentially life-threatening haematological complications have been reported with this drug regimen.
OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of ticlopidine plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulants after coronary stenting SEARCH STRATEGY: Electronic search of the Cochrane Library, Medline, Embase from 1991 to June 1999; references from trials and experts. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials comparing ticlopidine plus aspirin versus oral anticoagulants (either with or without aspirin) after elective or bail out coronary stenting. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Three reviewers assessed trial quality and compiled data on outcomes including: total mortality, non fatal myocardial infarction and revascularization occurring within the first 30 days after hospitalization, stent thrombosis on angiography, major and minor bleeding, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura. MAIN
RESULTS: Four trials (n=2436 patients) were included. Ticlopidine plus aspirin compared to oral anticoagulants significantly reduced the risk of non-fatal acute myocardial infarction and revascularization at 30 days, combined negative events (mortality, myocardial infarction, revascularization at 30 days) (RR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.25-0.69; NNT for 30 days: 22; 95% CI: 14-45), and major bleeding (RR in high quality studies: 0.24; 95% CI: 0.07-0.79). Ticlopidine plus aspirin compared to oral anticoagulants significantly increased the risk of eutropenia, thrombocytopenia and neutropenia (RR 5; 95% CI: 1.08-13.07; NNT for 30 days: 142; 95% CI: 76-1000). Ticlopidine plus aspirin vs oral anticoagulation did not affect all cause mortality. Ticlopidine plus aspirin significantly reduced the risk of stent thrombosis (angiography) which was seen only on studies with blinded outcome assessment (RR: 0.14; 95% CI: 0.03-0.60; NNT for 30 days: 33; 95% CI:16-166). Minor bleeding was reported only in one study and no studies recorded thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Ticlopidine plus aspirin after coronary stenting is effective in reducing the risk of the revascularization, non fatal myocardial infarction and bleeding complications when compared with oral anticoagulants. No effect is observed on total mortality. However, the haematological side effects of ticlopidine are still a matter of concern, and strict monitoring of blood-cell counts is recommended. Physicians should also be aware of the possibility of rare although potentially life-threatening complications such as TTP

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687144     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD002133

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  8 in total

1.  Antithrombotic therapy for atrial fibrillation: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  John J You; Daniel E Singer; Patricia A Howard; Deirdre A Lane; Mark H Eckman; Margaret C Fang; Elaine M Hylek; Sam Schulman; Alan S Go; Michael Hughes; Frederick A Spencer; Warren J Manning; Jonathan L Halperin; Gregory Y H Lip
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

2.  Primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease: Antithrombotic Therapy and Prevention of Thrombosis, 9th ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines.

Authors:  Per Olav Vandvik; A Michael Lincoff; Joel M Gore; David D Gutterman; Frank A Sonnenberg; Pablo Alonso-Coello; Elie A Akl; Maarten G Lansberg; Gordon H Guyatt; Frederick A Spencer
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2012-02       Impact factor: 9.410

Review 3.  A systematic review of Cochrane anticoagulation reviews.

Authors:  David Keith Cundiff
Journal:  Medscape J Med       Date:  2009-01-06

Review 4.  The evolution of antiplatelet therapy in the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: from aspirin to the present day.

Authors:  Dominick J Angiolillo
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Predictive distributions for between-study heterogeneity and simple methods for their application in Bayesian meta-analysis.

Authors:  Rebecca M Turner; Dan Jackson; Yinghui Wei; Simon G Thompson; Julian P T Higgins
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 2.373

Review 6.  Current and Novel Antiplatelet Therapies for the Treatment of Cardiovascular Diseases.

Authors:  Georges Jourdi; Marie Lordkipanidzé; Aurélien Philippe; Christilla Bachelot-Loza; Pascale Gaussem
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-12-03       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 7.  Antiplatelet therapy for aneurysmal subarachnoid haemorrhage.

Authors:  S M Dorhout Mees; W M van den Bergh; A Algra; G J E Rinkel
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2007-10-17

8.  Comparison of cilostazol versus ticlopidine following coronary stenting in patients with coronary heart disease: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Feng-Huan Hu; Xin Yi; Yue-Jing Yang; Shu-Bin Qiao; Yong-Jian Wu; Jian-Song Yuan
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2013-07-01       Impact factor: 2.447

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.