Literature DB >> 11687128

Screening for breast cancer with mammography.

O Olsen1, P C Gøtzsche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Mammographic screening for breast cancer is controversial, as reflected in greatly varying national policies.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effect of screening for breast cancer with mammography on mortality and morbidity. SEARCH STRATEGY: MEDLINE (16 May 2000), The Cochrane Breast Cancer Group's trial register (24 Jan 2000) and reference lists. Letters, abstracts and unpublished trials. Authors were contacted. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials comparing mammographic screening with no mammographic screening. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Data were extracted by both authors independently. MAIN
RESULTS: Seven completed and eligible trials involving half a million women were identified. The two best trials provided medium-quality data and, when combined, yield a relative risk for overall mortality of 1.00 (95% CI 0.96-1.05) after 13 years. However, the trials are underpowered for all-cause mortality, and confidence intervals include a possible worthwhile effect as well as a possible detrimental effect. If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for overall mortality after 13 years is 1.01 (95% CI 0.99-1.03). The best trials failed to show a significant reduction in breast cancer mortality with a relative risk of 0.97 (95% CI 0.82-1.14). If data from all eligible trials (excluding flawed studies) are considered then the relative risk for breast cancer mortality after 13 years is 0.80 (95% CI 0.71-0.89). However, breast cancer mortality is considered to be an unreliable outcome and biased in favour of screening. Flaws are due to differential exclusion of women with breast cancer from analysis and differential misclassification of cause of death. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: The currently available reliable evidence does not show a survival benefit of mass screening for breast cancer (and the evidence is inconclusive for breast cancer mortality). Women, clinicians and policy makers should consider these findings carefully when they decide whether or not to attend or support screening programs.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11687128     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  30 in total

1.  Office of NHS cancer screening programme misrepresents Nordic work in breast screening row.

Authors:  P C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

2.  Selling sickness: the pharmaceutical industry and disease mongering.

Authors:  Ray Moynihan; Iona Heath; David Henry
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-04-13

3.  Presentation on websites of possible benefits and harms from screening for breast cancer: cross sectional study.

Authors:  Karsten Juhl Jørgensen; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-17

Review 4.  Women need better information about routine mammography.

Authors:  Hazel Thornton; Adrian Edwards; Michael Baum
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-07-12

5.  Breast cancer knowledge, attitudes and screening behaviors in two groups of Iranian women: physicians and non-health care personnel.

Authors:  Maryam Kadivar; Soodabeh Joolaee; Azadeh Joulaee; Nasser Bahrani; Niloufar Hosseini
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 2.037

Review 6.  Cochrane reviews compared with industry supported meta-analyses and other meta-analyses of the same drugs: systematic review.

Authors:  Anders W Jørgensen; Jørgen Hilden; Peter C Gøtzsche
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2006-10-06

7.  Viewpoint: It is time to reconsider policy for population-based mammography screening.

Authors:  Anne J Kearney
Journal:  J Public Health Policy       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.222

8.  Population-based screening for CKD.

Authors:  Neil R Powe; L Ebony Boulware
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 8.860

9.  Systematic reviews highlight the complex balance between good and harm from screening studies.

Authors:  L Moja; I Moschetti; A Liberati; G F Gensini; R Gusinu
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.397

10.  Effectiveness of early detection on breast cancer mortality reduction in Catalonia (Spain).

Authors:  Montserrat Rue; Ester Vilaprinyo; Sandra Lee; Montserrat Martinez-Alonso; Misericor-Dia Carles; Rafael Marcos-Gragera; Roger Pla; Josep-Alfons Espinas
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2009-09-15       Impact factor: 4.430

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.