C Kröner1, D Turnbull, C Wilkinson. 1. Departments of General Practice and Psychology, Adelaide University, North Terrace, Adelaide, Australia, 5005. deborah.turnbull@adelaide.edu.au
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The use of antenatal day care units is widely recognized as an alternative for inpatient care for women with complicated pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the clinical safety, plus maternal, perinatal and psychosocial consequences for the women and cost effectiveness of this type of care. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Group's Specialised Register of Controlled Trials was searched in May 2001 as well as the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR), CINAHL (1982-04 to 1998-10) and Current Contents (Life Sciences/Clinical Medicine 1995-05 to 1999). Conference proceedings of PSANZ (Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand) and FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrie) (1997) were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trial comparing day care with inpatient care for women with complicated pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed by two reviewers independently. The author of the study was contacted for additional information. Data were extracted by the same two reviewers independently. MAIN RESULTS: One trial involving 54 women was included. This trial was of average quality. It was found that day care assessment for non-proteinuric hypertension can reduce inpatient stay (difference in mean stay: 4.0 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1 to 5.9 days). Also a significant increase in the rate of induction of labour in the control group was found (4.9 times more likely: 95% CI: 1.6 to 13.8). The other clinical outcomes did not show a statistically significant difference between the control and intervention group. No other significant differences were observed. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Admission to day care for non-proteinuric hypertension reduces the amount of time spent in the hospital and proportion of women induced for labour. However, one trial of 54 women is not sufficient to draw sound conclusions. Additional studies are needed to give more solid evidence to confirm the advantages of antenatal day care units.
BACKGROUND: The use of antenatal day care units is widely recognized as an alternative for inpatient care for women with complicated pregnancy. OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the clinical safety, plus maternal, perinatal and psychosocial consequences for the women and cost effectiveness of this type of care. SEARCH STRATEGY: The Group's Specialised Register of Controlled Trials was searched in May 2001 as well as the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (CENTRAL/CCTR), CINAHL (1982-04 to 1998-10) and Current Contents (Life Sciences/Clinical Medicine 1995-05 to 1999). Conference proceedings of PSANZ (Perinatal Society of Australia and New Zealand) and FIGO (Fédération Internationale de Gynécologie et d'Obstétrie) (1997) were searched. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized trial comparing day care with inpatient care for women with complicated pregnancy. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Trial quality was assessed by two reviewers independently. The author of the study was contacted for additional information. Data were extracted by the same two reviewers independently. MAIN RESULTS: One trial involving 54 women was included. This trial was of average quality. It was found that day care assessment for non-proteinuric hypertension can reduce inpatient stay (difference in mean stay: 4.0 days; 95% confidence interval (CI): 2.1 to 5.9 days). Also a significant increase in the rate of induction of labour in the control group was found (4.9 times more likely: 95% CI: 1.6 to 13.8). The other clinical outcomes did not show a statistically significant difference between the control and intervention group. No other significant differences were observed. REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS: Admission to day care for non-proteinuric hypertension reduces the amount of time spent in the hospital and proportion of women induced for labour. However, one trial of 54 women is not sufficient to draw sound conclusions. Additional studies are needed to give more solid evidence to confirm the advantages of antenatal day care units.
Authors: Rachel A Haws; Mohammad Yawar Yakoob; Tanya Soomro; Esme V Menezes; Gary L Darmstadt; Zulfiqar A Bhutta Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2009-05-07 Impact factor: 3.007