Literature DB >> 11686980

Interventions for treating headlice.

C S Dodd1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Infection with head lice is a widespread condition in developed and developing countries. Infection occurs most commonly in children, but also affects adults. If left untreated the condition can become intensely irritating and skin infections may occur if the bites are scratched.
OBJECTIVES: The aim of this review was to assess the effects of interventions for head lice. SEARCH STRATEGY: Trials register of The Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group; Medline; Embase; Science Citation Index; Biosis and Toxline; reference lists of relevant articles; pharmaceutical companies producing pediculicides (published and unpublished trials); UK and US Regulatory Authorities. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised trials (published and unpublished) or trials using alternate allocation were sought which compared pediculicides with the same and different formulations of other pediculicides, and pediculicides with physical methods. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Of the 71 identified studies, only four met the inclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality. One reviewer extracted the data. MAIN
RESULTS: We found no evidence that any one pediculicide has greater effect than another. The two studies comparing malathion and permethrin with their respective vehicles showed a higher cure rate for the active ingredient than the vehicle. Another study comparing synergised pyrethrins with permethrin showed their effects to be equivalent. A comparative trial of malathion lotion vs combing, showed combing to be ineffective for the cureative treatment of head lice infection. Adverse effects were reported in a number of trials and were all minor, although reporting quality varied between trials. REVIEWER'S
CONCLUSIONS: Permethrin, synergised pyrethrin and malathion were effective in the treatment of head lice. However, the emergence of drug resistance since these trials were conducted means there is no direct contemporary evidence of the comparative effectiveness of these products. The 'best' choice will now depend on local resistance patterns. Physical treatment methods(BugBusting) were shown ot be ineffective to treat head lice. No evidence exists regarding other chemical control methods such as the use of herbal treatments, when used in the curative treatment of head lice. Future trials should take into account the methodological recommendations that arise from this review.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11686980     DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev        ISSN: 1361-6137


  7 in total

1.  Treatment of head lice.

Authors:  C Dodd
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-11-10

2.  Combing and combating head lice.

Authors:  Martin Dawes
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2005-08-13

Review 3.  Is wet combing effective in children with pediculosis capitis infestation?

Authors:  Marc Tebruegge; Jane Runnacles
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Head lice infestations: A clinical update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.253

5.  Head lice infestations: A clinical update.

Authors: 
Journal:  Paediatr Child Health       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 2.253

Review 6.  Treatment of Pediculosis Capitis.

Authors:  Prashant Verma; Chaitanya Namdeo
Journal:  Indian J Dermatol       Date:  2015 May-Jun       Impact factor: 1.494

7.  Outcomes of the California ban on pharmaceutical lindane: clinical and ecologic impacts.

Authors:  Elizabeth H Humphreys; Sarah Janssen; Ann Heil; Patricia Hiatt; Gina Solomon; Mark D Miller
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 9.031

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.