Literature DB >> 11686529

Rectoanal inhibition and rectocele: physiology versus categorization.

A P Zbar1, M Beer-Gabel, M Aslam.   

Abstract

Some authors divide rectoceles into those with chronic evacuatory difficulty and normal genital position (type 1) and those with associated pelvic organ prolapse (type 2). This study assessed whether there are physiological differences between these two clinical rectocele types. Female patients were assessed by conventional anorectal manometry, vector manometry, parametric assessment of the rectoanal inhibitory reflex (RAIR), and defecography. Subjects included 33 volunteer controls without anorectal disease, 14 patients with type I rectocele, and 26 patients with type II rectocele. Significant differences were noted for resting pressure measurements (maximal resting anal pressure and vector volume) between rectocele types and between type I patients and controls. Significant differences were noted for squeeze parameters (maximal squeeze pressure and vector volume) only between rectocele types. There were minimal differences in parameters of the RAIR, with a reduced slope of inhibition in the proximal sphincter for both rectocele groups and a reduced maximal inhibitory pressure in the intermediate and distal sphincter of type 1 rectocele patients. There were no differences in transient excitation of the pressure wave during the RAIR reflex to account for pressure variations with no measured differences in rectocele depth (type 1, 2.87 +/- 0.7 cm; type 2, 2.84 +/- 1.4 cm) There are few physiological differences between the different clinical categories of rectocele patients based on the presence or absence of associated genital prolapse.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11686529     DOI: 10.1007/s003840100315

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 0179-1958            Impact factor:   2.571


  4 in total

Review 1.  Rectocele: pathogenesis and surgical management.

Authors:  A P Zbar; A Lienemann; H Fritsch; M Beer-Gabel; M Pescatori
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2003-03-29       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Rectocele--does the size matter?

Authors:  Dan Carter; Marc Beer Gabel
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2012-02-04       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Comparative Study Between Trans-perineal Repair With or Without Limited Internal Sphincterotomy in the Treatment of Type I Anterior Rectocele: a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Mohamed Youssef; Sameh Hany Emile; Waleed Thabet; Hossam Ayman Elfeki; Alaa Magdy; Waleed Omar; Wael Khafagy; Mohamed Farid
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-24       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Absent or impaired rectoanal inhibitory reflex as a diagnostic factor for high-grade (grade III-V) rectal prolapse: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Byung-Soo Park; Sung Hwan Cho; Gyung Mo Son; Hyun Sung Kim; Yong-Hoon Cho; Dae Gon Ryu; Su Jin Kim; Su Bum Park; Cheol Woong Choi; Hyung Wook Kim; Tae Un Kim; Dong Soo Suh; Myunghee Yoon; Hong Jae Jo
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 3.067

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.