Literature DB >> 11685958

Septal suturing following nasal septoplasty, a valid alternative for nasal packing?

W Lemmens1, P Lemkens.   

Abstract

Septal suturing following nasal septoplasty, a valid alternative for nasal packing? After septal surgery most surgeons still routinely perform nasal packing since this is generally recommended. The aims of packing are numerous: haemostasis, prevention of haematoma, increase septal flap apposition, closure of dead space and prevention of displacement of the replaced cartilage. However, nasal packing is not an innocuous procedure and may lead to cardiovascular changes, continued bleeding, nasal injury, hypoxia, foreign body reaction or infection. The major disadvantage of nasal packing is patient discomfort--usually necessitating hospital stay--and the need to administer antibiotics. Therefore alternatives were sought. Sessions, Lee and Vukovic conceived and reported in the eighties forms of continuous septal suturing, but are not widely used. A similar technique of septal suturing after nasal septoplasty without nasal packing was used in 226 consecutive surgical procedures and reviewed retrospectively. Complications like postoperative episodes of bleeding, infections, septal haematomas, septal perforations or synechia were not noted. On one patient a recurrence of the septal deviation occurred. Patients reported almost no discomfort. Moreover, the septal surgery procedure could be carried out on a day-surgery basis. Readmission of a patient was never necessary. Based on these observations the septal suturing technique is a valid alternative to intranasal packing following septal surgery.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11685958

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Belg        ISSN: 0001-6497


  18 in total

1.  A survey of postoperative nasal packing among UK ENT surgeons.

Authors:  Costa Repanos; Stephen E McDonald; Amir H Sadr
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Safety of (rhino)septoplasty without nasal packing in routine ENT practice.

Authors:  Nancy Seghers; Stéphane Ledeghen; Stéphanie Collet; Jean-Christophe Degols
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2021-03-18       Impact factor: 2.503

Review 3.  Comparison on effectiveness of trans-septal suturing versus nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Wei-Wei Wang; Bao-Cheng Dong
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 2.503

4.  A novel way of trans-septal splint suturing without nasal packing for septoplasty.

Authors:  Kiran Naik
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2014-08-10

5.  A comparison of the effects of packing or transseptal suture on polysomnographic parameters in septoplasty.

Authors:  Murat Turhan; Aslı Bostancı; Mehmet Akdag; Oktay Dinc
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2012-10-05       Impact factor: 2.503

6.  Nasal packing and trans-septal suturing after septoplasty.

Authors:  Zhengcai Lou; Zi-Han Lou
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 2.503

7.  Nasal packing and transseptal suturing techniques: surgical and anaesthetic perspectives.

Authors:  Rıza Önder Günaydın; Erdinc Aygenc; Selma Karakullukcu; Fatih Fidan; Serdar Celikkanat
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-03-02       Impact factor: 2.503

8.  Nasal septal clips: an alternative to nasal packing after septal surgery?

Authors:  Anand Veluswamy; Sachin Handa; Santosh Shivaswamy
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2011-11-30

9.  Comparison of septoplasty with and without nasal packing and review of literature.

Authors:  Rajashri S Mane; Balasaheb Patil; Anjana Mohite
Journal:  Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2013-02-08

10.  Effect of nasal packing and haemostatic septal suture on mucociliary activity after septoplasty: an assessment by rhinoscintigraphy.

Authors:  Mustafa Kula; Imdat Yuce; Yasar Unlu; Ahmet Tutus; Sedat Cagli; Ibrahim Ketenci
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 2.503

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.