OBJECTIVES: To study whether PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions--defined as the decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on a single or three computerized tomographic (CT) sections--is representative of the decrease in overall nonaerated lung volume. DESIGN: Review of 39 CT scans obtained in consecutive patients with Acute Lung Injury. SETTINGS: Fourteen-bed surgical intensive care unit of a University Hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: PEEP-induced decrease in nonaerated lung volume was measured in 39 patients with ALI on a single juxtadiaphragmatic CT section, on three CT sections--apical, hilar, and juxtadiaphragmatic--and on contiguous apex-to-diaphragm CT sections. The percentage of decrease in nonaerated lung volume following PEEP, was compared between one, three and all CT sections using a linear regression analysis and Bland and Altman's method. The decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on a single and three CT sections was significantly correlated with the decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on all CT sections: R=0.83, P<0.0001 for one CT section and R=0.92, P<0.0001 for three CT sections. However, measurements performed on a single CT section were poorly representative of the overall lung: bias -6%, limits of agreement ranging between -37% and +25%. Measurements performed on three CT sections overestimated by 11% the overall decrease in nonaerated lung volume: bias -11%, limits of agreement ranging between -29% and +7%. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on a single or three CT sections sensibly differs from the reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on the overall lung. The inhomogeneous distribution of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions along the cephalocaudal axis probably explains these discrepancies.
OBJECTIVES: To study whether PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions--defined as the decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on a single or three computerized tomographic (CT) sections--is representative of the decrease in overall nonaerated lung volume. DESIGN: Review of 39 CT scans obtained in consecutive patients with Acute Lung Injury. SETTINGS: Fourteen-bed surgical intensive care unit of a University Hospital. MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS: PEEP-induced decrease in nonaerated lung volume was measured in 39 patients with ALI on a single juxtadiaphragmatic CT section, on three CT sections--apical, hilar, and juxtadiaphragmatic--and on contiguous apex-to-diaphragm CT sections. The percentage of decrease in nonaerated lung volume following PEEP, was compared between one, three and all CT sections using a linear regression analysis and Bland and Altman's method. The decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on a single and three CT sections was significantly correlated with the decrease in nonaerated lung volume measured on all CT sections: R=0.83, P<0.0001 for one CT section and R=0.92, P<0.0001 for three CT sections. However, measurements performed on a single CT section were poorly representative of the overall lung: bias -6%, limits of agreement ranging between -37% and +25%. Measurements performed on three CT sections overestimated by 11% the overall decrease in nonaerated lung volume: bias -11%, limits of agreement ranging between -29% and +7%. CONCLUSIONS: PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on a single or three CT sections sensibly differs from the reopening of collapsed lung regions measured on the overall lung. The inhomogeneous distribution of PEEP-induced reopening of collapsed lung regions along the cephalocaudal axis probably explains these discrepancies.
Authors: A W Reske; A P Reske; H A Gast; M Seiwerts; A Beda; U Gottschaldt; C Josten; D Schreiter; N Heller; H Wrigge; M B Amato Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-08-06 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Jean-Christophe Richard; Didier Le Bars; Nicolas Costes; Fabienne Bregeon; Christian Tourvieille; Franck Lavenne; Marc Janier; Gérard Gimenez; Claude Guerin Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2006-09-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Yi Xin; Gang Song; Maurizio Cereda; Stephen Kadlecek; Hooman Hamedani; Yunqing Jiang; Jennia Rajaei; Justin Clapp; Harrilla Profka; Natalie Meeder; Jue Wu; Nicholas J Tustison; James C Gee; Rahim R Rizi Journal: J Appl Physiol (1985) Date: 2014-11-13
Authors: Thomas Lescot; Marie-Pierre Bonnet; Abederrezak Zouaoui; Jean-Charles Muller; Catalin Fetita; Pierre Coriat; Louis Puybasset Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-07-01 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Guillermo M Albaiceta; Luis H Luyando; Diego Parra; Rafael Menendez; Juan Calvo; Paula Rodríguez Pedreira; Francisco Taboada Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2005-08-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Davide Chiumello; Antonella Marino; Matteo Brioni; Federica Menga; Irene Cigada; Marco Lazzerini; Maria C Andrisani; Pietro Biondetti; Bruno Cesana; Luciano Gattinoni Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2012-09-19 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Guillermo Bugedo; Alejandro Bruhn; Glenn Hernández; Gonzalo Rojas; Cristián Varela; Juan Carlos Tapia; Luis Castillo Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-01-18 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Marcelo Gama de Abreu; Maximiliano Cuevas; Peter M Spieth; Alysson R Carvalho; Volker Hietschold; Christian Stroszczynski; Bärbel Wiedemann; Thea Koch; Paolo Pelosi; Edmund Koch Journal: Crit Care Date: 2010-03-16 Impact factor: 9.097