OBJECTIVE: To evaluate non-invasive ventilation (NIV) prospectively in a group of patients developing acute respiratory failure (ARF) after bilateral lung transplantation (BLT). SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) of Rome "La Sapienza" University. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients (18 with cystic fibrosis) undergoing BLT. RESULTS: All consecutive patients developing ARF (according to predefined criteria) and requiring ventilatory support, received non-invasive pressure support ventilation through a face-mask (PEEP 5 cmH2O, PSV 14+/-2 cmH2O) for a mean period of 5+/-4 days. Eighteen out of 21 patients avoided intubation and were discharged from the ICU; 3 patients required intubation: 1 of them survived while 2 developed septic shock and died. CONCLUSIONS: NIV administration was well tolerated and avoided intubation in the large majority of patients (86%); in NIV responders the rate of complications was low and ICU mortality nil. NIV should be considered as an interesting alternative to conventional ventilation in patients who require ventilatory support after BLT.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate non-invasive ventilation (NIV) prospectively in a group of patients developing acute respiratory failure (ARF) after bilateral lung transplantation (BLT). SETTING: General intensive care unit (ICU) of Rome "La Sapienza" University. PATIENTS: Twenty-one patients (18 with cystic fibrosis) undergoing BLT. RESULTS: All consecutive patients developing ARF (according to predefined criteria) and requiring ventilatory support, received non-invasive pressure support ventilation through a face-mask (PEEP 5 cmH2O, PSV 14+/-2 cmH2O) for a mean period of 5+/-4 days. Eighteen out of 21 patients avoided intubation and were discharged from the ICU; 3 patients required intubation: 1 of them survived while 2 developed septic shock and died. CONCLUSIONS: NIV administration was well tolerated and avoided intubation in the large majority of patients (86%); in NIV responders the rate of complications was low and ICU mortality nil. NIV should be considered as an interesting alternative to conventional ventilation in patients who require ventilatory support after BLT.
Authors: Barbara C S Hamilton; Gabriela R Dincheva; Michael A Matthay; Steven Hays; Jonathan P Singer; Marek Brzezinski; Jasleen Kukreja Journal: J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg Date: 2020-03-04 Impact factor: 5.209
Authors: Anke Kohlenberg; Frank Schwab; Michael Behnke; Christine Geffers; Petra Gastmeier Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2010-03-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Marco Piastra; Daniele De Luca; Domenico Pietrini; Silvia Pulitanò; Sonia D'Arrigo; Aldo Mancino; Giorgio Conti Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2009-06-23 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Miguel Fernández-Vivas; Juan Caturla-Such; Javier González de la Rosa; José Acosta-Escribano; Bernabé Alvarez-Sánchez; José Cánovas-Robles Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2003-06-12 Impact factor: 17.440