OBJECTIVES: Genetic causes of sporadic and familial renal oncocytomas are not known. We analyzed these tumors genetically in order to detect tumor-specific chromosome alterations. METHODS: DNA from 26 sporadic and 31 familial renal oncocytomas were screened by comparative genomic hybridization according to standard protocols including degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR. RESULTS: Chromosome alterations were detected in 19/26 sporadic (73%) and in 4/31 familial renal oncocytomas (13%). Partial or complete losses of chromosome 1 were most frequently found in both sporadic (15/26) and familial tumors (2/4). Less frequently, loss of chromosome 14 (3/26) was detected in sporadic renal oncocytomas as well as losses of 2p, 2q, 4q, 10 and 18 and gains of 1q and 17q in individual sporadic tumors. Inter-tumor variation of chromosome aberrations was prominent in 1 patient, where 1 tumor showed gains of chromosomes 5, 6q, 7, 10p, 12 and 13q, whereas the second tumor exhibited gains of chromosomes 5 and 7 and loss of 10q. In contrast to sporadic renal oncocytomas, most familial tumors (87%) were devoid of chromosome instabilities. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that partial or complete loss of chromosome 1 is the most common alteration in renal oncocytomas, sporadic and familial. However, chromosome changes are much rarer in familial than in sporadic renal oncocytomas.
OBJECTIVES: Genetic causes of sporadic and familial renal oncocytomas are not known. We analyzed these tumors genetically in order to detect tumor-specific chromosome alterations. METHODS: DNA from 26 sporadic and 31 familial renal oncocytomas were screened by comparative genomic hybridization according to standard protocols including degenerate oligonucleotide-primed PCR. RESULTS: Chromosome alterations were detected in 19/26 sporadic (73%) and in 4/31 familial renal oncocytomas (13%). Partial or complete losses of chromosome 1 were most frequently found in both sporadic (15/26) and familial tumors (2/4). Less frequently, loss of chromosome 14 (3/26) was detected in sporadic renal oncocytomas as well as losses of 2p, 2q, 4q, 10 and 18 and gains of 1q and 17q in individual sporadic tumors. Inter-tumor variation of chromosome aberrations was prominent in 1 patient, where 1 tumor showed gains of chromosomes 5, 6q, 7, 10p, 12 and 13q, whereas the second tumor exhibited gains of chromosomes 5 and 7 and loss of 10q. In contrast to sporadic renal oncocytomas, most familial tumors (87%) were devoid of chromosome instabilities. CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that partial or complete loss of chromosome 1 is the most common alteration in renal oncocytomas, sporadic and familial. However, chromosome changes are much rarer in familial than in sporadic renal oncocytomas.
Authors: Ronald S Boris; Jihane Benhammou; Maria Merino; Peter A Pinto; W Marston Linehan; Gennady Bratslavsky Journal: J Urol Date: 2011-04-15 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Jeff A Klomp; David Petillo; Natalie M Niemi; Karl J Dykema; Jindong Chen; Ximing J Yang; Annika Sääf; Peter Zickert; Markus Aly; Ulf Bergerheim; Magnus Nordenskjöld; Sophie Gad; Sophie Giraud; Yves Denoux; Laurent Yonneau; Arnaud Méjean; Viorel Vasiliu; Stéphane Richard; Jeffrey P MacKeigan; Bin T Teh; Kyle A Furge Journal: BMC Med Genomics Date: 2010-12-16 Impact factor: 3.063
Authors: Jill M Hagenkord; Anil V Parwani; Maureen A Lyons-Weiler; Karla Alvarez; Robert Amato; Zoran Gatalica; Jose M Gonzalez-Berjon; Leif Peterson; Rajiv Dhir; Federico A Monzon Journal: Diagn Pathol Date: 2008-11-06 Impact factor: 2.644