Literature DB >> 11684842

MRI appearance of prostate following transrectal HIFU ablation of localized cancer.

O Rouvière1, D Lyonnet, A Raudrant, C Colin-Pangaud, J Y Chapelon, R Bouvier, J M Dubernard, A Gelet.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the accuracy of gadolinium-enhanced MRI in gauging the extent of the tissue damage induced by transrectal high intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) therapy and to assess how well the results obtained with this modality correlate with histological findings (control biopsies).
METHODS: Twenty-one patients with biopsy-proven prostate cancer (T1-T2-T3a, Nx, M0) who gave informed consent were included in the protocol. They underwent pre- and postoperative (2-5 days after HIFU treatment) MR examinations. Fifteen patients also underwent a follow-up MR examination 1-5 months postoperatively. MR findings were compared with the results of postoperative transrectal biopsy examinations.
RESULTS: The prostate volume increased after the HIFU session from 43.9+/-18.6 to 52.1+/-21 cm(3) by day 2 (p<0.001). On fat-saturated gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted images, the treated area appeared as a hypointense zone surrounded by a peripheral rim of enhancement in all patients. A positive correlation (r = 0.75) was found between the volume of the hypointense zone measured at days 2-5 (30+/-11 cm(3), 67% of the posttreatment prostate volume) and the theoretical target volume (22+/-5 cm(3), 61% of the initial prostate volume). MRI showed that the anterior part of the base was not reached by the ultrasound beam. The mean volume of the untreated zone (prostate without any MRI modifications) was 8 cm(3) (range, 0.4-36). No correlation was found between the MRI appearance of the treated area and the intensity of the necrosis or the presence of foci of residual, viable cancer.
CONCLUSION: Gadolinium-enhanced MRI is an accurate way of determining the extent of tissue damage induced in HIFU ablative therapy, but cannot predict histological results.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684842     DOI: 10.1159/000049786

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Urol        ISSN: 0302-2838            Impact factor:   20.096


  22 in total

Review 1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate, Including Pre- and Postinterventions.

Authors:  Pritesh Patel; Aytekin Oto
Journal:  Semin Intervent Radiol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.513

Review 2.  MR imaging of treated prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hebert Alberto Vargas; Cecilia Wassberg; Oguz Akin; Hedvig Hricak
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Comparative study of conventional US, contrast enhanced US and enhanced MR for the follow-up of prostatic radiofrequency ablation.

Authors:  Chao Feng; Bin Hu; Bing Hu; Lei Chen; Jia Li; Jin Huang
Journal:  Exp Ther Med       Date:  2017-04-28       Impact factor: 2.447

4.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in focal therapy for prostate cancer: recommendations from a consensus panel.

Authors:  Berrend G Muller; Jurgen J Fütterer; Rajan T Gupta; Aaron Katz; Alexander Kirkham; John Kurhanewicz; Judd W Moul; Peter A Pinto; Ardeshir R Rastinehad; Cary Robertson; Jean de la Rosette; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; J Stephen Jones; Osamu Ukimura; Sadhna Verma; Hessel Wijkstra; Michael Marberger
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-11-13       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  [HIFU in urological oncology].

Authors:  S Thüroff; C Chaussy
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 0.639

6.  Prostate cancer transrectal HIFU ablation: detection of local recurrences using T2-weighted and dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Nicolas Girouin; Ludivine Glas; Alexandre Ben Cheikh; Albert Gelet; Florence Mège-Lechevallier; Muriel Rabilloud; Jean-Yves Chapelon; Denis Lyonnet
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  [Transrectal high-intensity focused ultrasound for local treatment of prostate cancer. 2009 Update].

Authors:  C G Chaussy; S Thüroff
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 8.  Prostate focused ultrasound focal therapy--imaging for the future.

Authors:  Olivier Rouvière; Albert Gelet; Sébastien Crouzet; Jean-Yves Chapelon
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-08-21       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Dynamic contrast-enhanced MR evaluation of prostate cancer before and after endorectal high-intensity focused ultrasound.

Authors:  R Del Vescovo; F Pisanti; V Russo; S Battisti; R L Cazzato; F D'Agostino; F Giurazza; C C Quattrocchi; E Faiella; R Setola; R Giulianelli; R F Grasso; B Beomonte Zobel
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2012-09-17       Impact factor: 3.469

Review 10.  Current status of high-intensity focused ultrasound for prostate cancer: technology, clinical outcomes, and future.

Authors:  François-Joseph L Murat; Albert Gelet
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.092

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.