Literature DB >> 11684824

Screening of first degree relatives of patients operated for colorectal cancer: evaluation of fecal calprotectin vs. hemoccult II.

J Kristinsson1, K Nygaard, E Aadland, S Barstad, J Sauar, B Hofstad, N Stray, A Stallemo, B Haug, M Ugstad, H Tøn, P Fuglerud.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Fecal calprotectin (CPT) is elevated in the majority of patients with known colorectal cancer (CRC), but the specificity is not clarified. AIM: To evaluate if a CPT test (PhiCal ELISA) was more sensitive than Hemoccult II test in detecting colorectal neoplasia, and to obtain reference values in subjects with normal colonoscopy. To evaluate a possible relation between number and extent of dysplasia of adenomas in first degree relatives of patients with CRC and the stage of the carcinoma in the index casus. Further to study the prevalence of CRC and adenomas in the first degree relatives of patients operated for CRC.
METHOD: In a multicenter study, 253 first degree relatives of patients with CRC, aged 50-75 years (mean age 60 years) underwent colonoscopy after having delivered stool samples and three Hemoccult II slides.
RESULTS: In 237 first degree relatives from 148 patients with CRC, polyps were found in 118 (50%). Seventy three (31%) had adenomas and 17 had adenomas > or =10 mm. Five had asymptomatic cancers. The specificity of fecal CPT for adenomas at cut off levels <or =10, < or =15 and < or =20 mg/l were 47.4, 59.6 and 71.1%, respectively (max of three samples). The sensitivity at same cut off levels was 56.2, 45.2 and 31.5% and 4/5 of patients with carcinoma had CPT values >15 mg/l. The sensitivity of Hemoccult II for adenomas was 8%, and 4/5 of patients with carcinoma had negative Hemoccult II. The specificity for adenomas was 95%.
CONCLUSION: Fecal CPT test was more sensitive than Hemoccult II in detecting colorectal neoplasia but the specificity was lower. In a high risk group like first degree relatives of patients with CRC, there are good reasons to consider fecal CPT as a first test in selecting patients for endoscopy. Copyright 2001 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11684824     DOI: 10.1159/000048848

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Digestion        ISSN: 0012-2823            Impact factor:   3.216


  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of flexible sigmoidoscopy as an investigation for "left sided" colorectal symptoms.

Authors:  S Papagrigoriadis; I Arunkumar; A Koreli; W A Corbett
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.401

Review 2.  Effect of verification bias on the sensitivity of fecal occult blood testing: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alan S Rosman; Mark A Korsten
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2010-05-25       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Validation and clinical significance of a new calprotectin rapid test for the diagnosis of gastrointestinal diseases.

Authors:  A Damms; S C Bischoff
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2008-07-16       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Usefulness of fecal lactoferrin and hemoglobin in diagnosis of colorectal diseases.

Authors:  Ichiro Hirata; Masahiro Hoshimoto; Osamu Saito; Masanobu Kayazawa; Takashi Nishikawa; Mitsuyuki Murano; Ken Toshina; Fang-Yu Wang; Ryoichi Matsuse
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-14       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT).

Authors:  G Hoff; T Grotmol; E Thiis-Evensen; M Bretthauer; G Gondal; M H Vatn
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 23.059

6.  Serum sCD26 for colorectal cancer screening in family-risk individuals: comparison with faecal immunochemical test.

Authors:  O Otero-Estévez; L De Chiara; F J Rodríguez-Berrocal; M Páez de la Cadena; J Cubiella; I Castro; C Gonzalez-Mao; V Hernandez; V S Martínez-Zorzano
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-12-02       Impact factor: 7.640

7.  The role of faecal calprotectin in diagnosis and staging of colorectal neoplasia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Fiona A Ross; James H Park; David Mansouri; Emilie Combet; Paul G Horgan; Donald C McMillan; Campbell S D Roxburgh
Journal:  BMC Gastroenterol       Date:  2022-04-09       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Comparison of faecal protein biomarkers' diagnostic accuracy for colorectal advanced neoplasms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Atefeh Nasir Kansestani; Mohammad Erfan Zare; Qingchao Tong; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-16       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 9.  Advances in Fecal Occult Blood Tests: the FIT revolution.

Authors:  Graeme P Young; Erin L Symonds; James E Allison; Stephen R Cole; Callum G Fraser; Stephen P Halloran; Ernst J Kuipers; Helen E Seaman
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 3.199

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.