J A Weintraub1, S C Stearns, R G Rozier, C C Huang. 1. Department of Preventive and Restorative Dental Sciences, School of Dentistry, University of California, San Francisco 94118-1361, USA. janew@itsa.ucsf.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort analysis of children enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid program compared the likelihood of restorative treatments and associated cumulative Medicaid expenditures for teeth with or without dental sealants. METHODS: We assessed the dental experience of the cohort of 15 438 children from 1985 to 1992 on the basis of enrollment and claims files. We conducted regression analyses for outcomes (caries-related services involving the occlusal surface [CRSOs] of permanent first molars) and cumulative expenditures, controlling for characteristics of the child, the treating dentist, and the child's county of residence. RESULTS: Overall, 23% of children received at least 1 sealant and 33% at least 1 CRSO. Sealants were effective in preventing CRSOs, although the degree of effectiveness was highest for children with the greater levels of CRSOs before sealant placement. Estimated cumulative Medicaid expenditures indicated expenditure savings from sealants within 2 years of application for children with 2 or more prior CRSOs. CONCLUSIONS: Sealant placement was associated with expenditure savings to Medicaid for certain high-risk children, so Medicaid and, more broadly, society will benefit by providing for sealant placement in these children.
OBJECTIVES: This retrospective cohort analysis of children enrolled in the North Carolina Medicaid program compared the likelihood of restorative treatments and associated cumulative Medicaid expenditures for teeth with or without dental sealants. METHODS: We assessed the dental experience of the cohort of 15 438 children from 1985 to 1992 on the basis of enrollment and claims files. We conducted regression analyses for outcomes (caries-related services involving the occlusal surface [CRSOs] of permanent first molars) and cumulative expenditures, controlling for characteristics of the child, the treating dentist, and the child's county of residence. RESULTS: Overall, 23% of children received at least 1 sealant and 33% at least 1 CRSO. Sealants were effective in preventing CRSOs, although the degree of effectiveness was highest for children with the greater levels of CRSOs before sealant placement. Estimated cumulative Medicaid expenditures indicated expenditure savings from sealants within 2 years of application for children with 2 or more prior CRSOs. CONCLUSIONS: Sealant placement was associated with expenditure savings to Medicaid for certain high-risk children, so Medicaid and, more broadly, society will benefit by providing for sealant placement in these children.
Authors: Susan Griffin; Shillpa Naavaal; Christina Scherrer; Paul M Griffin; Kate Harris; Sajal Chattopadhyay Journal: Health Aff (Millwood) Date: 2016-12-01 Impact factor: 6.301
Authors: M Fontana; J A Platt; G J Eckert; C González-Cabezas; K Yoder; D T Zero; M Ando; A E Soto-Rojas; M C Peters Journal: J Dent Res Date: 2014-09-23 Impact factor: 6.116
Authors: Bisakha Sen; Justin Blackburn; Meredith L Kilgore; Michael A Morrisey; David J Becker; Cathy Caldwell; Nir Menachemi Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2016-02-29 Impact factor: 3.402
Authors: Alfa Yansane; Stefan Listl; Dyutee Dawda; Ryan Brandon; Joel White; Heiko Spallek; Muhammad F Walji; Elsbeth Kalenderian Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2020-09-09 Impact factor: 1.821
Authors: Andreea Voinea-Griffin; Jeffrey L Fellows; Donald B Rindal; Andrei Barasch; Gregg H Gilbert; Monika M Safford Journal: BMC Oral Health Date: 2010-04-28 Impact factor: 2.757
Authors: Donald L Chi; Elizabeth T Momany; Raymond A Kuthy; Jane M Chalmers; Peter C Damiano Journal: J Public Health Dent Date: 2010 Impact factor: 1.821