M Tseng1, K Yeatts, R Millikan, B Newman. 1. Division of Population Science, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, Pa 19111, USA. m_tseng@fccc.edu
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether area-level characteristics are associated with individual smoking behavior among women. METHODS: Analyses included 648 women enrolled as control patients in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993-1996). Smoking and covariate information was obtained from interviews. Area-level characteristics included census block-group education level, poverty, unemployment, car-home ownership, crowding, and, for 431 women, city-level crime rates. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression models, no area characteristics were clearly associated with a history of smoking. Among those who had ever smoked, continued smoking was associated with living in low-education areas (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0, 2.9), high-unemployment areas (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.8), and high-crime areas (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.8, 3.2). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings are consistent with a growing literature suggesting that area-level social and economic disadvantage influences individual smoking behavior.
OBJECTIVES: This study examined whether area-level characteristics are associated with individual smoking behavior among women. METHODS: Analyses included 648 women enrolled as control patients in the Carolina Breast Cancer Study (1993-1996). Smoking and covariate information was obtained from interviews. Area-level characteristics included census block-group education level, poverty, unemployment, car-home ownership, crowding, and, for 431 women, city-level crime rates. RESULTS: In multivariate logistic regression models, no area characteristics were clearly associated with a history of smoking. Among those who had ever smoked, continued smoking was associated with living in low-education areas (odds ratio [OR] = 1.7, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.0, 2.9), high-unemployment areas (OR = 1.7, 95% CI = 1.0, 2.8), and high-crime areas (OR = 1.6, 95% CI = 0.8, 3.2). CONCLUSIONS: The present findings are consistent with a growing literature suggesting that area-level social and economic disadvantage influences individual smoking behavior.
Authors: Robert A Schnoll; Paul F Engstrom; Somasundaram Subramanian; Lev Demidov; Dustin B Wielt; Mourad Tighiouart Journal: Int J Behav Med Date: 2006
Authors: S Shohaimi; R Luben; N Wareham; N Day; S Bingham; A Welch; S Oakes; K-T Khaw Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2003-04 Impact factor: 3.710