BACKGROUND: The accurate measurement of food intake in children is important for assessing nutritional status. OBJECTIVE: We sought to both compare measurements of energy intake (EI) from diet records and of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water (DLW) method and to investigate misreporting of EI. DESIGN: Forty-seven children (22 boys and 25 girls) aged 7.4 +/- 0.8 y ( +/- SD) were recruited from 25 schools in western Sydney. TEE was measured by DLW over 10 d and EI by use of 3-d food records. Misreporting was defined as [(EI - TEE)/TEE] x 100%. RESULTS: Girls had a higher (P = 0.02) percentage of body fat (28.2 +/- 7.0%) than did boys (22.9 +/- 8.0%); otherwise there were no differences among sex. Although mean (+/-SD) values for EI (7514 +/- 1260 kJ/d) and TEE (7396 +/- 1281 kJ/d) were not significantly different, there was no significant correlation between EI and TEE. EI and TEE were 9% and 11% lower, respectively, than current World Health Organization recommendations for EI. The relative bias (mean difference, EI - TEE) was low at 118 kJ/d, but the limits of agreement (bias +/- 2 SD of the difference) were wide at 118 +/- 3345 kJ/d. Although the mean percentage of misreporting was low (4 +/- 23%), the high SD indicates large intraindividual differences between EI and TEE. The most significant predictor of misreporting was dietary fat intake (r(2) = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Misreporting was not associated with sex or body composition. CONCLUSIONS: In this age group, reported EI is not representative of TEE at the individual level. However, at the population level, 3-d food records may be used for surveys of EI by 6-9-y-old children.
BACKGROUND: The accurate measurement of food intake in children is important for assessing nutritional status. OBJECTIVE: We sought to both compare measurements of energy intake (EI) from diet records and of total energy expenditure (TEE) by the doubly labeled water (DLW) method and to investigate misreporting of EI. DESIGN: Forty-seven children (22 boys and 25 girls) aged 7.4 +/- 0.8 y ( +/- SD) were recruited from 25 schools in western Sydney. TEE was measured by DLW over 10 d and EI by use of 3-d food records. Misreporting was defined as [(EI - TEE)/TEE] x 100%. RESULTS:Girls had a higher (P = 0.02) percentage of body fat (28.2 +/- 7.0%) than did boys (22.9 +/- 8.0%); otherwise there were no differences among sex. Although mean (+/-SD) values for EI (7514 +/- 1260 kJ/d) and TEE (7396 +/- 1281 kJ/d) were not significantly different, there was no significant correlation between EI and TEE. EI and TEE were 9% and 11% lower, respectively, than current World Health Organization recommendations for EI. The relative bias (mean difference, EI - TEE) was low at 118 kJ/d, but the limits of agreement (bias +/- 2 SD of the difference) were wide at 118 +/- 3345 kJ/d. Although the mean percentage of misreporting was low (4 +/- 23%), the high SD indicates large intraindividual differences between EI and TEE. The most significant predictor of misreporting was dietary fat intake (r(2) = 0.45, P < 0.0001). Misreporting was not associated with sex or body composition. CONCLUSIONS: In this age group, reported EI is not representative of TEE at the individual level. However, at the population level, 3-d food records may be used for surveys of EI by 6-9-y-old children.
Authors: J N Davis; E E Ventura; A Tung; M A Munevar; R E Hasson; C Byrd-Williams; A K Vanni; D Spruijt-Metz; M Weigensberg; M I Goran Journal: Pediatr Obes Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 4.000
Authors: Caroline H Guinn; Suzanne D Baxter; Julie A Royer; James W Hardin; Alyssa J Mackelprang; Albert F Smith Journal: J Health Psychol Date: 2010-05
Authors: Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Mark S Litaker; Caroline H Guinn; Michele D Nichols; Patricia H Miller; Katherine Kipp Journal: J Am Diet Assoc Date: 2006-10
Authors: Salman Kirmani; David Christen; G Harry van Lenthe; Philip R Fischer; Mary L Bouxsein; Louise K McCready; L Joseph Melton; B Lawrence Riggs; Shreyasee Amin; Ralph Müller; Sundeep Khosla Journal: J Bone Miner Res Date: 2009-06 Impact factor: 6.741
Authors: Suzanne Domel Baxter; Albert F Smith; Michele D Nichols; Caroline H Guinn; James W Hardin Journal: Nutr Res Date: 2006-06 Impact factor: 3.315
Authors: Christine Delisle Nyström; Elisabet Forsum; Hanna Henriksson; Ylva Trolle-Lagerros; Christel Larsson; Ralph Maddison; Toomas Timpka; Marie Löf Journal: Nutrients Date: 2016-01-15 Impact factor: 5.717