BACKGROUND: Data on adverse events to antiretroviral treatment have been recorded in clinical trials, post-marketing analyses, and anecdotal reports. Such data might not be an up-to-date or comprehensive assessment of all possible treatment combinations defined as potent antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: Using a standard clinical and laboratory method, we assessed prevalence of adverse events in 1160 patients who were receiving antiretroviral treatment. We measured the toxic effects associated with the drug regimen (protease inhibitor [PI], non-nucleoside and nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor) and specific compounds using multivariate analyses. FINDINGS: 47% (545 of 1160) of patients presented with clinical and 27% (194 of 712) with laboratory adverse events probably or definitely attributed to antiretroviral treatment. Among these, 9% (47 of 545) and 16% (30 of 194), respectively, were graded as serious or severe. Single-PI and PI-sparing-antiretroviral treatment were associated with a comparable prevalence of adverse events. Compared with single-PI treatment, use of dual-PI-antiretroviral treatment and three-class-antiretroviral treatment was associated with higher prevalence of adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 2.0 [95% CI 1.0-4.0], and 3.9 [1.2-12.9], respectively). Compound specific associations were identified for zidovudine, lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, abacavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, efavirenz, and nevirapine. INTERPRETATION: We recorded a high prevalence of toxic effects attributed to antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1. Such data provides a reference for regimen-specific and compound-specific adverse events and could be useful in postmarketing analyses of toxic effects.
BACKGROUND: Data on adverse events to antiretroviral treatment have been recorded in clinical trials, post-marketing analyses, and anecdotal reports. Such data might not be an up-to-date or comprehensive assessment of all possible treatment combinations defined as potent antiretroviral treatment. METHODS: Using a standard clinical and laboratory method, we assessed prevalence of adverse events in 1160 patients who were receiving antiretroviral treatment. We measured the toxic effects associated with the drug regimen (protease inhibitor [PI], non-nucleoside and nucleoside analogue reverse transcriptase inhibitor) and specific compounds using multivariate analyses. FINDINGS: 47% (545 of 1160) of patients presented with clinical and 27% (194 of 712) with laboratory adverse events probably or definitely attributed to antiretroviral treatment. Among these, 9% (47 of 545) and 16% (30 of 194), respectively, were graded as serious or severe. Single-PI and PI-sparing-antiretroviral treatment were associated with a comparable prevalence of adverse events. Compared with single-PI treatment, use of dual-PI-antiretroviral treatment and three-class-antiretroviral treatment was associated with higher prevalence of adverse events (odds ratio [OR] 2.0 [95% CI 1.0-4.0], and 3.9 [1.2-12.9], respectively). Compound specific associations were identified for zidovudine, lamivudine, stavudine, didanosine, abacavir, ritonavir, saquinavir, indinavir, nelfinavir, efavirenz, and nevirapine. INTERPRETATION: We recorded a high prevalence of toxic effects attributed to antiretroviral treatment for HIV-1. Such data provides a reference for regimen-specific and compound-specific adverse events and could be useful in postmarketing analyses of toxic effects.
Authors: Pyoeng Gyun Choe; Wan Beom Park; Jin Su Song; Nak-Hyun Kim; Kyoung-Ho Song; Sang Won Park; Hong Bin Kim; Nam Joong Kim; Myoung-don Oh Journal: J Korean Med Sci Date: 2010-09-17 Impact factor: 2.153
Authors: Paula A Rochon; Jerry H Gurwitz; Kathy Sykora; Muhammad Mamdani; David L Streiner; Susan Garfinkel; Sharon-Lise T Normand; Geoffrey M Anderson Journal: BMJ Date: 2005-04-16
Authors: Huanyu Dou; Christopher J Destache; Justin R Morehead; R Lee Mosley; Michael D Boska; Jeffrey Kingsley; Santhi Gorantla; Larisa Poluektova; Jay A Nelson; Mahesh Chaubal; Jane Werling; James Kipp; Barrett E Rabinow; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Blood Date: 2006-06-29 Impact factor: 22.113
Authors: Baligh R Yehia; Kelly A Gebo; Perrin B Hicks; P Todd Korthuis; Richard D Moore; Michelande Ridore; William Christopher Mathews Journal: AIDS Patient Care STDS Date: 2008-12 Impact factor: 5.078
Authors: M Waiswa; B B Byarugaba; P Ocama; H Mayanja-Kizza; E Seremba; S Ganguli; M Crowther; R Colebunders Journal: Afr Health Sci Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 0.927
Authors: Yihong Li; Deepak Saxena; Zhou Chen; Gaoxia Liu; Willam R Abrams; Joan A Phelan; Robert G Norman; Gene S Fisch; Patricia M Corby; Floyd Dewhirst; Bruce J Paster; Alexis S Kokaras; Daniel Malamud Journal: J Clin Microbiol Date: 2014-02-12 Impact factor: 5.948
Authors: Michael W-H Wang; Shi Wei; Roberta Faccio; Sunao Takeshita; Pablo Tebas; William G Powderly; Steven L Teitelbaum; F Patrick Ross Journal: J Clin Invest Date: 2004-07 Impact factor: 14.808
Authors: Ari S Nowacek; Reagan L Miller; Joellyn McMillan; Georgette Kanmogne; Michel Kanmogne; R Lee Mosley; Zhiya Ma; Sabine Graham; Mahesh Chaubal; Jane Werling; Barrett Rabinow; Huanyu Dou; Howard E Gendelman Journal: Nanomedicine (Lond) Date: 2009-12 Impact factor: 5.307