M S Kristensen1, J Møller. 1. Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Centre of Head and Orthopaedics, Copenhagen University Hospital, Rigshospitalet, Denmark. msk@rh.dk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Problems with managing the airways in relation to anaesthesia causes severe morbidity and mortality. A large proportion of these adverse respiratory events is preventable. Still patients continue to die from airway disasters related to anaesthesia, also in Scandinavia. The goal of this study is to identify which efforts are likely to improve this situation. METHODS: A questionnaire asking about experience, behaviour and availability of various items of equipment was mailed to all members of the Danish Society of Anaesthesiologists and were returned anonymously. RESULTS: More than 65% of respondents have sufficient access to a flexible fibrescope, but still 17% of specialists have no access and the vast majority (>67%) has little (1-10 times) or no experience in its use for awake intubation. A total of 52-70% knew the basic principles of the ASA difficult airway algorithm, but despite this only 25-50% would perform awake intubation if a difficult intubation was expected. More than 20% of respondents had experienced preventable airway management mishaps. In all, 18-46% did not know how to oxygenate via the cricothyroid membrane. CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement regarding airway management skills among Danish anaesthesiologists. It is likely that airway management can be improved by: A) Better knowledge of an appropriate plan, algorithm, for airway management. B) Awake intubation used more often. C) More experience in fibreoptic intubation. D) All anaesthesiologists accepting that previous difficult intubation is an indicator of future difficulties. E) All anaesthesiologists knowing, and practising on manikins, how to oxygenate via the cricothyroid membrane. F) Always having a laryngeal mask airway immediately available when inducing anaesthesia.
BACKGROUND: Problems with managing the airways in relation to anaesthesia causes severe morbidity and mortality. A large proportion of these adverse respiratory events is preventable. Still patients continue to die from airway disasters related to anaesthesia, also in Scandinavia. The goal of this study is to identify which efforts are likely to improve this situation. METHODS: A questionnaire asking about experience, behaviour and availability of various items of equipment was mailed to all members of the Danish Society of Anaesthesiologists and were returned anonymously. RESULTS: More than 65% of respondents have sufficient access to a flexible fibrescope, but still 17% of specialists have no access and the vast majority (>67%) has little (1-10 times) or no experience in its use for awake intubation. A total of 52-70% knew the basic principles of the ASA difficult airway algorithm, but despite this only 25-50% would perform awake intubation if a difficult intubation was expected. More than 20% of respondents had experienced preventable airway management mishaps. In all, 18-46% did not know how to oxygenate via the cricothyroid membrane. CONCLUSION: There is room for improvement regarding airway management skills among Danish anaesthesiologists. It is likely that airway management can be improved by: A) Better knowledge of an appropriate plan, algorithm, for airway management. B) Awake intubation used more often. C) More experience in fibreoptic intubation. D) All anaesthesiologists accepting that previous difficult intubation is an indicator of future difficulties. E) All anaesthesiologists knowing, and practising on manikins, how to oxygenate via the cricothyroid membrane. F) Always having a laryngeal mask airway immediately available when inducing anaesthesia.
Authors: Biljana Kuzmanovska; Mirjana Shosholcheva; Andrijan Kartalov; Marija Jovanovski-Srceva; Aleksandra Gavrilovska-Brzanov Journal: Open Access Maced J Med Sci Date: 2019-09-12
Authors: Stephen J M Sollid; Jon Kenneth Heltne; Eldar Søreide; Hans Morten Lossius Journal: Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med Date: 2008-07-21 Impact factor: 2.953