Literature DB >> 11683494

Cell type proportioning in Dictyostelium slugs: lack of regulation within a 2.5-fold tolerance range.

I Ràfols1, A Amagai, Y Maeda, H K MacWilliams, Y Sawada.   

Abstract

The proportion of prestalk and prespore cells in Dictyostelium discoideum slugs is often cited as an example of "almost perfect" regulation. The pattern is similar over a very wide range of cell number; furthermore, removal of either of the cell types leads to compensatory transdifferentiation. Several studies of Dictyostelium fruiting bodies, however, have suggested that proportioning in Dictyostelium differs systematically from true constancy. We have confirmed this in the slug stage using a short-lived beta-galactosidase as a reporter of the prestalk specific ecmA gene expression: the prestalk proportion decreases from 24+/-5% in slugs of 10(3) cells to 10+/-3% when 10(5) cells are present. Regeneration experiments suggest that this difference is not due to a modulation of the proportioning set-point by size, as one might have expected; instead there appears to be a regulatory "tolerance zone" at all sizes. After amputation of the whole posterior region, transdifferentiation stops after the fraction of prestalk has been reduced from 100% to 28+/-20%, well above the initial value of 10+/-3%, while after anterior removal the transdifferentiation endpoint is about 10%. Most strikingly, we find no regulation at all after partial amputations of the prespore region. It seems that any prestalk proportion is stable between a approximately 10% lower threshold and a approximately 30% upper threshold. To explain this, we propose a regulation mechanism based on a negative feedback plus cell type bistability. In both intact and regenerating slugs we find that the slug morphology is regulated so that the length-to-width ratio of the anterior region is constant.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11683494     DOI: 10.1046/j.1432-0436.2001.670403.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Differentiation        ISSN: 0301-4681            Impact factor:   3.880


  8 in total

1.  Direct mechanical force measurements during the migration of Dictyostelium slugs using flexible substrata.

Authors:  Jean-Paul Rieu; Catherine Barentin; Yasuo Maeda; Yasuji Sawada
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-08-19       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 2.  Progress and perspectives in signal transduction, actin dynamics, and movement at the cell and tissue level: lessons from Dictyostelium.

Authors:  Till Bretschneider; Hans G Othmer; Cornelis J Weijer
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2016-10-06       Impact factor: 3.906

3.  Developmental commitment in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Mariko Katoh; Guokai Chen; Emily Roberge; Gad Shaulsky; Adam Kuspa
Journal:  Eukaryot Cell       Date:  2007-09-28

4.  The G alpha subunit Gα8 inhibits proliferation, promotes adhesion and regulates cell differentiation.

Authors:  Yuantai Wu; Chris Janetopoulos
Journal:  Dev Biol       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 3.582

5.  Cell fate choice and social evolution in Dictyostelium discoideum: interplay of morphogens and heterogeneities.

Authors:  T S Kawli; S Kaushik
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 2.795

6.  Cell Cycle Heterogeneity Can Generate Robust Cell Type Proportioning.

Authors:  Nicole Gruenheit; Katie Parkinson; Christopher A Brimson; Satoshi Kuwana; Edward J Johnson; Koki Nagayama; Jack Llewellyn; William M Salvidge; Balint Stewart; Thomas Keller; Wouter van Zon; Simon L Cotter; Christopher R L Thompson
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2018-10-25       Impact factor: 12.270

7.  An anatomy ontology to represent biological knowledge in Dictyostelium discoideum.

Authors:  Pascale Gaudet; Jeffery G Williams; Petra Fey; Rex L Chisholm
Journal:  BMC Genomics       Date:  2008-03-18       Impact factor: 3.969

8.  Migration in the social stage of Dictyostelium discoideum amoebae impacts competition.

Authors:  Chandra N Jack; Neil Buttery; Boahemaa Adu-Oppong; Michael Powers; Christopher R L Thompson; David C Queller; Joan E Strassmann
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2015-10-22       Impact factor: 2.984

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.