Literature DB >> 11683413

A functional comparison of mutations in integrin beta cytoplasmic domains: effects on the regulation of tyrosine phosphorylation, cell spreading, cell attachment and beta1 integrin conformation.

A L Bodeau1, A L Berrier, A M Mastrangelo, R Martinez, S E LaFlamme.   

Abstract

Cell adhesion is a multistep process that requires the interaction of integrins with their ligands in cell attachment, the activation of integrin-triggered signals, and cell spreading. Integrin beta subunit cytoplasmic domains (beta tails) participate in regulating each of these steps; however, it is not known whether the same or different regions within beta tails are required. We generated a panel of amino acid substitutions within the beta1 and beta3 cytoplasmic domains to determine whether distinct regions within beta3 tails regulate different steps in adhesion. We expressed these beta cytoplasmic domains in the context of interleukin 2 (IL-2) receptor (tac) chimeras and tested their ability to activate tyrosine phosphorylation, to regulate beta1 integrin conformation and to inhibit beta1 integrin function in cell attachment and spreading. We found that many of the mutant beta3 and beta3 chimeras either had no effect on these parameters or dramatically inhibited the function of the beta tail in most assays. However, one set of analogous Ala substitutions in the beta1 and beta3 tails differentially affected the ability of the tac-beta3 and tac-beta3 chimeras to activate tyrosine phosphorylation. The tac-beta1 mutant containing Ala substitutions for the VTT motif did not signal, whereas the analogous tac-beta3 mutant was able to activate tyrosine phosphorylation, albeit not to wild-type levels. We also identified a few mutations that inhibited beta tail function in only a subset of assays. Ala substitutions for the Val residue in the VTT motif of the beta1 tail or for the conserved Asp and Glu residues in the membrane-proximal region of the beta3 tail greatly diminished the ability of tac-beta1 and tac-beta3 to inhibit cell spreading, but had minimal effects in other assays. Ala substitutions for the Trp and Asp residues in the conserved WDT motif in the beta1 tail had dramatic effects on the ability of tac-beta1 to regulate integrin conformation and function in cell spreading, but had no or intermediate effects in other assays. The identification of mutations in the beta1 and beta3 tails that specifically abrogated the ability of these beta tails to regulate beta1 integrin conformation and function in cell spreading suggests that distinct protein interactions with beta tails regulate beta cytoplasmic domain function in these processes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11683413     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.114.15.2795

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  22 in total

1.  Integrins regulate microtubule nucleating activity of centrosome through mitogen-activated protein kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase kinase/extracellular signal-regulated kinase (MEK/ERK) signaling.

Authors:  Diane Colello; Shomita Mathew; Rachel Ward; Kevin Pumiglia; Susan E LaFlamme
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2011-11-22       Impact factor: 5.157

2.  Integrin-linked kinase regulates integrin signaling in human trabecular meshwork cells.

Authors:  Jennifer A Faralli; Jessica R Newman; Nader Sheibani; Shoukat Dedhar; Donna M Peters
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2011-03-25       Impact factor: 4.799

3.  p21-activated kinase 4 phosphorylation of integrin beta5 Ser-759 and Ser-762 regulates cell migration.

Authors:  Zhilun Li; Hongquan Zhang; Lars Lundin; Minna Thullberg; Yajuan Liu; Yunling Wang; Lena Claesson-Welsh; Staffan Strömblad
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-05-27       Impact factor: 5.157

4.  The NPIY motif in the integrin beta1 tail dictates the requirement for talin-1 in outside-in signaling.

Authors:  Bethsaida Nieves; Christopher W Jones; Rachel Ward; Yasutaka Ohta; Carlos G Reverte; Susan E LaFlamme
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2010-03-23       Impact factor: 5.285

5.  The membrane-proximal KXGFFKR motif of α-integrin mediates chemoresistance.

Authors:  Chi-Chao Liu; Pascal Leclair; Shyong Quin Yap; Chinten James Lim
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2013-09-03       Impact factor: 4.272

6.  The talin rod IBS2 alpha-helix interacts with the beta3 integrin cytoplasmic tail membrane-proximal helix by establishing charge complementary salt bridges.

Authors:  Sophie Rodius; Olivier Chaloin; Michèle Moes; Elisabeth Schaffner-Reckinger; Isabelle Landrieu; Guy Lippens; Minghui Lin; Ji Zhang; Nelly Kieffer
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2008-06-23       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 7.  Manipulation of Focal Adhesion Signaling by Pathogenic Microbes.

Authors:  Korinn N Murphy; Amanda J Brinkworth
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-01-29       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 8.  Talin and kindlin: the one-two punch in integrin activation.

Authors:  Feng Ye; Adam K Snider; Mark H Ginsberg
Journal:  Front Med       Date:  2014-01-29       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  beta1 integrin cytoplasmic domain residues selectively modulate fibronectin matrix assembly and cell spreading through talin and Akt-1.

Authors:  J Angelo Green; Allison L Berrier; Roumen Pankov; Kenneth M Yamada
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-01-14       Impact factor: 5.157

Review 10.  Integrins as regulators of the mitotic machinery.

Authors:  Susan E LaFlamme; Bethsaida Nieves; Diane Colello; Carlos G Reverte
Journal:  Curr Opin Cell Biol       Date:  2008-07-25       Impact factor: 8.382

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.