Literature DB >> 11682428

Positive pressure ventilation with the ProSeal versus classic laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, crossover study of healthy female patients.

J Brimacombe1, C Keller, M Boehler, F Pühringer.   

Abstract

IMPLICATIONS: The ProSeal and classic laryngeal mask airways are equally effective ventilatory devices in healthy female patients at tidal volumes of 8 and 12 mL/kg with the cuff semi- or fully inflated, but leakage of small volumes of air from the mouth occurs more frequently with the laryngeal mask airway.

Entities:  

Mesh：

Year:  2001        PMID： 11682428     DOI： 10.1097/00000539-200111000-00064

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesth Analg        ISSN： 0003-2999            Impact factor:   5.108


  12 in total

1.  Oral gastric tube-guided insertion of the ProSeal™ laryngeal mask is an easy and noninvasive method for less experienced users.

Authors:  Takako Nagata; Yoshihiko Kishi; Hironobu Tanigami; Yuki Hiuge; Shunji Sonoda; Yoshifumi Ohashi; Kiyokazu Kagawa; Azusa Ushioda
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 2.078

Review 2.  ProSeal versus Classic laryngeal mask airway (LMA) for positive pressure ventilation in adults undergoing elective surgery.

Authors:  Muhammad Qamarul Hoda; Khalid Samad; Hameed Ullah
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-20

3.  i-gel™ in Ambulatory Surgery: A Comparison with LMA-ProSeal™ in Paralyzed Anaesthetized Patients.

Authors:  Anjan Das; Saikat Majumdar; Anindya Mukherjee; Tapobrata Mitra; Ratul Kundu; Bimal Kumar Hajra; Dipankar Mukherjee; Bibhukalyani Das
Journal:  J Clin Diagn Res       Date:  2014-03-15

4.  [Evaluation of the new supraglottic airway devices Ambu AuraOnce and Intersurgical i-gel. Positioning, sealing, patient comfort and airway morbidity].

Authors:  J F Heuer; M Stiller; J Rathgeber; C Eich; K Züchner; M Bauer; A Timmermann
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 1.041

5.  Size 2.5 ProSeal(™) LMA: Is it associated with increased attempts at insertion?

Authors:  Aparna Sinha; Bimla Sharma; Jayashree Sood
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2012-01

6.  Comparison of streamlined liner of the pharynx airway (SLIPA™) with the laryngeal mask airway Proseal™ for lower abdominal laparoscopic surgeries in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.

Authors:  Ashraf Abualhassan Abdellatif; Monaz Abdulrahman Ali
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2011-07

Review 7.  Comparison of the i-gel and the laryngeal mask airway proseal during general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sun Kyung Park; Geun Joo Choi; Yun Suk Choi; Eun Jin Ahn; Hyun Kang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A prospective, randomized, Single-blinded, comparative study of Classic Laryngeal Mask Airway and ProSeal Laryngeal Mask Airway in pediatric patients.

Authors:  Bikramjit Das; Shahin N Jamil; Subhro Mitra; Rohit K Varshney
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2012-07

9.  Comparative evaluation of gum-elastic bougie and introducer tool as aids in positioning of ProSeal laryngeal mask airway in patients with simulated restricted neck mobility.

Authors:  Jennyl Maclean; Dk Tripathy; S Parthasarathy; M Ravishankar
Journal:  Indian J Anaesth       Date:  2013-05

10.  Comparison of I-gel with proseal LMA in adult patients undergoing elective surgical procedures under general anesthesia without paralysis: A prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Gurudas Kini; Gopalkrishna Mettinadka Devanna; Koteswara Rao Mukkapati; Souvik Chaudhuri; Daniel Thomas
Journal:  J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-04
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.