Literature DB >> 11682366

Regression calibration in studies with correlated variables measured with error.

G E Fraser1, D O Stram.   

Abstract

Regression calibration is a technique that corrects biases in regression results in situations where exposure variables are measured with error. The existence of a calibration substudy, where accurate and crude measurement methods are related by a second regression analysis, is assumed. The cost of measurement error in multivariate analyses is loss of statistical power. In this paper, calibration data from California Seventh-day Adventists are used to simulate study populations and new calibration studies. Applying regression calibration logistic analyses, the authors estimate power for pairs of nutritional variables. The results demonstrate substantial loss of power if variables measured with error are strongly correlated. Biases in estimated effects in cases where regression calibration is not performed can be large and are corrected by regression calibration. When the true coefficient has zero value, the corresponding coefficient in a crude analysis will usually have a nonzero expected value. Then type I error probabilities are not nominal, and the erroneous appearance of statistical significance can readily occur, particularly in large studies. Major determinants of power with use of regression calibration are collinearity between the variables measured with error and the size of correlations between crude and corresponding true variables. Where there is important collinearity, useful gains in power accrue with calibration study size up to 1,000 subjects.

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11682366     DOI: 10.1093/aje/154.9.836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Epidemiol        ISSN: 0002-9262            Impact factor:   4.897


  14 in total

1.  Regression calibration when foods (measured with error) are the variables of interest: markedly non-Gaussian data with many zeroes.

Authors:  Gary E Fraser; Daniel O Stram
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-01-20       Impact factor: 4.897

2.  Adjusting effect estimates for unmeasured confounding with validation data using propensity score calibration.

Authors:  Til Stürmer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Jerry Avorn; Robert J Glynn
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2005-06-29       Impact factor: 4.897

3.  Recalibration methods to enhance information on prevalence rates from large mental health surveys.

Authors:  N A Taub; Z Morgan; T S Brugha; P C Lambert; P E Bebbington; R Jenkins; R C Kessler; A M Zaslavsky; T Hotz
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 4.035

4.  Assessment of dietary isoflavone intake among middle-aged Chinese men.

Authors:  Sang-Ah Lee; Wanqing Wen; Yong-Bing Xiang; Stephen Barnes; Dake Liu; Qiuyin Cai; Wei Zheng; Xiao Ou Shu
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 4.798

5.  Racial/Ethnic Differences in Lung Cancer Incidence in the Multiethnic Cohort Study: An Update.

Authors:  Daniel O Stram; S Lani Park; Christopher A Haiman; Sharon E Murphy; Yesha Patel; Stephen S Hecht; Loic Le Marchand
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2019-08-01       Impact factor: 13.506

6.  Race-specific validation of food intake obtained from a comprehensive FFQ: the Adventist Health Study-2.

Authors:  Karen Jaceldo-Siegl; Jing Fan; Joan Sabaté; Synnove F Knutsen; Ella Haddad; W Lawrence Beeson; R Patti Herring; Terrence L Butler; Hannelore Bennett; Gary E Fraser
Journal:  Public Health Nutr       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 4.022

7.  Joint effects of sodium and potassium intake on subsequent cardiovascular disease: the Trials of Hypertension Prevention follow-up study.

Authors:  Nancy R Cook; Eva Obarzanek; Jeffrey A Cutler; Julie E Buring; Kathryn M Rexrode; Shiriki K Kumanyika; Lawrence J Appel; Paul K Whelton
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  2009-01-12

8.  Air pollution exposure assessment for epidemiologic studies of pregnant women and children: lessons learned from the Centers for Children's Environmental Health and Disease Prevention Research.

Authors:  Frank Gilliland; Ed Avol; Patrick Kinney; Michael Jerrett; Timothy Dvonch; Frederick Lurmann; Timothy Buckley; Patrick Breysse; Gerald Keeler; Tracy de Villiers; Rob McConnell
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 9.031

9.  The impact of imprecisely measured covariates on estimating gene-environment interactions.

Authors:  Darren C Greenwood; Mark S Gilthorpe; Janet E Cade
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2006-05-04       Impact factor: 4.615

Review 10.  The role of epidemiology studies in human health risk assessment of polychlorinated biphenyls.

Authors:  Krista Christensen; Laura M Carlson; Geniece M Lehmann
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2020-12-30       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.