M Bares1, I Rektor. 1. 1st Department of Neurology, Masaryk University, St. Anne's Hospital, Pekarska 53, 656 91, Brno, Czech Republic. martin.bares@fnusa.cz
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial recordings were taken from the basal ganglia (BG) in order to explore the possible role of the BG in the cognitive processing of sensory information. METHODS: Ten patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy, who were candidates for epilepsy surgery, underwent intracranial recordings with depth electrodes. A frontal approach was used for the insertion of diagonal depth electrodes into the amygdalo-hippocampal complex (AH complex). These electrodes passed through the BG. The putamen was explored in 8 patients; the nucleus caudatus and pallidum were explored in two patients. The contingent negative variation (CNV) paradigm was tested using auditory warning stimuli and visual imperative stimuli followed by a hand flexion. The auditory and visual middle and late latency potentials evoked by the warning and imperative stimuli were analyzed. RESULTS: (1) Auditory evoked potentials (EPs): the amplitude potential gradient was observed with latencies of (a) 150-195ms (9 patients); (b) 215-290ms (9 patients); and (c) 350-600ms (10 patients). Negative potentials, with latencies of 100 and 110ms were observed in two patients. (2) Visual EPs: (a) 160-195ms (9 patients); (b) 210-295ms (9 patients); and (c) 330-550ms (7 patients). Negative potentials with latencies between 100 and 120ms were observed in 4 patients. CNV was obtained from the BG in 8 patients; a phase reversal was observed twice. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The BG generate middle and late latency EPs in a cognitive paradigm linked to the motor task. (2) The BG generate CNV. (3) The BG could play an integrative role in the processing of sensory, cognitive, and motor information.
OBJECTIVE: Intracranial recordings were taken from the basal ganglia (BG) in order to explore the possible role of the BG in the cognitive processing of sensory information. METHODS: Ten patients with intractable temporal lobe epilepsy, who were candidates for epilepsy surgery, underwent intracranial recordings with depth electrodes. A frontal approach was used for the insertion of diagonal depth electrodes into the amygdalo-hippocampal complex (AH complex). These electrodes passed through the BG. The putamen was explored in 8 patients; the nucleus caudatus and pallidum were explored in two patients. The contingent negative variation (CNV) paradigm was tested using auditory warning stimuli and visual imperative stimuli followed by a hand flexion. The auditory and visual middle and late latency potentials evoked by the warning and imperative stimuli were analyzed. RESULTS: (1) Auditory evoked potentials (EPs): the amplitude potential gradient was observed with latencies of (a) 150-195ms (9 patients); (b) 215-290ms (9 patients); and (c) 350-600ms (10 patients). Negative potentials, with latencies of 100 and 110ms were observed in two patients. (2) Visual EPs: (a) 160-195ms (9 patients); (b) 210-295ms (9 patients); and (c) 330-550ms (7 patients). Negative potentials with latencies between 100 and 120ms were observed in 4 patients. CNV was obtained from the BG in 8 patients; a phase reversal was observed twice. CONCLUSIONS: (1) The BG generate middle and late latency EPs in a cognitive paradigm linked to the motor task. (2) The BG generate CNV. (3) The BG could play an integrative role in the processing of sensory, cognitive, and motor information.
Authors: Ivan Rektor; Martin Bares; Petr Kanovský; Milan Brázdil; Irena Klajblová; Hana Streitová; Irena Rektorová; Daniela Sochůrková; Dagmar Kubová; Robert Kuba; Pavel Daniel Journal: Exp Brain Res Date: 2004-06-22 Impact factor: 1.972
Authors: Tim Martin; Jon M Houck; Joel Pearson Bish; Dubravko Kicić; C Chad Woodruff; Sandra N Moses; Dustin C Lee; Claudia D Tesche Journal: Hum Brain Mapp Date: 2006-07 Impact factor: 5.038
Authors: Petr Kaňovský; Raymond Rosales; Pavel Otruba; Martin Nevrlý; Lenka Hvizdošová; Robert Opavský; Michaela Kaiserová; Pavel Hok; Kateřina Menšíková; Petr Hluštík; Martin Bareš Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2021-02-16 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Eduard Minks; Pavel Jurák; Jan Chládek; Jan Chrastina; Josef Halámek; Daniel J Shaw; Martin Bareš Journal: J Neural Transm (Vienna) Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 3.575
Authors: Mirta Fiorio; Enza Maria Valente; Mattia Gambarin; Anna Rita Bentivoglio; Tamara Ialongo; Alberto Albanese; Paolo Barone; Maria Teresa Pellecchia; Francesco Brancati; Giuseppe Moretto; Antonio Fiaschi; Michele Tinazzi Journal: J Neurol Date: 2008-07-03 Impact factor: 4.849
Authors: Linda L Chao; Valerie A Cardenas; Dieter J Meyerhoff; Johannes C Rothlind; Derek L Flenniken; Joselyn A Lindgren; Michael W Weiner Journal: Neuroreport Date: 2003-11-14 Impact factor: 1.837
Authors: Jamie Purzner; Guillermo O Paradiso; Danny Cunic; Jean A Saint-Cyr; Tasnuva Hoque; Andres M Lozano; Anthony E Lang; Elena Moro; Mojgan Hodaie; Filomena Mazzella; Robert Chen Journal: J Neurosci Date: 2007-05-30 Impact factor: 6.167