Literature DB >> 11681680

Phytotoxicity of pheromonal chemicals to fruit tree foliage: chemical and physiological characterization.

P Y Giroux1, J R Miller.   

Abstract

Some recent high-load, low-density pheromone-release devices emit an ethanolic blend of pheromone directly onto crop foliage to control insect pests by mating disruption. This study characterized the phytotoxicity associated with deposition of some pheromonal compounds in concentrated drops on the foliage of trees bearing aerosol release devices. The relative toxicity of straight-chained alkanes, alcohols, aldehydes, and acetates with chain lengths varying from C-2 to approximately C-20 was quantified in the laboratory by the severity of necrotic lesions. The order of severity for phytotoxicity caused by pheromonal compounds was alkanes << acetates = aldehydes < or = alcohols. Within compound classes tested, pheromones with chain lengths of 6-13 carbons were the most phytotoxic. Phytotoxicity was not detectable at dosages <1 mg administered in 10 microl of ethanol. Phytotoxicity of pheromones was highly correlated with presence of both a hydrophilic and lipophilic molecular domain. We postulate nonspecific membrane disruption as a likely mode of action for pheromonal phytotoxicity. Limited attempts to remediate this effect by changing carrier solvents or adding surfactants, spreaders, or nonvolatile diluents were not successful. Because the toxic action of pheromones upon plant tissues appears relatively benign, and growers have not been adverse to localized phytotoxicity to foliage and fruits on two trees per 0.4 ha, we propose that limited phytotoxicity associated with first-generation aerosol dispenser technology can be viewed as non-threatening.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681680     DOI: 10.1603/0022-0493-94.5.1170

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Econ Entomol        ISSN: 0022-0493            Impact factor:   2.381


  2 in total

1.  Differentiation of competitive vs. non-competitive mechanisms mediating disruption of moth sexual communication by point sources of sex pheromone (part 2): Case studies.

Authors:  J R Miller; L J Gut; F M de Lame; L L Stelinski
Journal:  J Chem Ecol       Date:  2006-10-04       Impact factor: 2.626

Review 2.  Sex Pheromone Aerosol Devices for Mating Disruption: Challenges for a Brighter Future.

Authors:  Giovanni Benelli; Andrea Lucchi; Donald Thomson; Claudio Ioriatti
Journal:  Insects       Date:  2019-09-20       Impact factor: 2.769

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.