Literature DB >> 11681480

Decision criteria and characteristics of Norwegian general dental practitioners selecting digital radiography.

A Wenzel1, A Møystad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate Norwegian general dental practitioners' decision criteria and characteristics for choosing digital radiographic equipment.
METHODS: A questionnaire was sent to all dental practitioners in Norway (n = 3940). They were categorised on the basis of their responses as either a 'digital radiography' (DR) or 'non-digital radiography' (non-DR) dentist. Demographic, clinical, and electronic technology variables were recorded. Dentists ranked on a six-point scale their reasons for choosing or not choosing digital radiography. Their responses were analysed by logistic regression.
RESULTS: Two thousand, one hundred and ninety-nine dentists (56%) replied. Three hundred and nine (14%), (219 men, 86 women and four not stated) had chosen to use digital radiography. The logistic regression analysis revealed that gender, age and years in dentistry were not significant factors in determining their decision, whereas working in a private or group practice was. The number of computers in the practice was the most important of the electronic technology variables. The non-DR dentists strongly agreed that 'digital radiography is too expensive' and were 'satisfied with film'. The DR dentists strongly agreed that the 'use of chemicals can be avoided', 'patient dose is reduced', and 'archiving is facilitated'.
CONCLUSION: Working in a private or group practice or using multiple computers were significant factors in choosing digital radiography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681480     DOI: 10.1038/sj.dmfr.4600612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol        ISSN: 0250-832X            Impact factor:   2.419


  9 in total

Review 1.  Questionnaire surveys of dentists on radiology.

Authors:  A M Shelley; P Brunton; K Horner
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 2.419

2.  The usage of digital radiography and cone beam computed tomography among Turkish dentists.

Authors:  Semanur Dölekoğlu; E Fişekçioğlu; M İlgüy; D İlgüy
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 2.419

3.  Digital dental radiology in Belgium: a nationwide survey.

Authors:  Robin Snel; Ellen Van De Maele; Constantinus Politis; Reinhilde Jacobs
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.419

4.  Effect of explaining radiographic information to the patient before third molar surgery.

Authors:  J Christensen; L H Matzen; A Wenzel
Journal:  Dentomaxillofac Radiol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 2.419

5.  Knowledge of Correct Prescription of Radiographs among Dentists in Yazd, Iran.

Authors:  Fatemeh Ezoddini Ardakani; Vahid Sarayesh
Journal:  J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects       Date:  2008-12-20

6.  Image quality evaluation of eight complementary metal-oxide semiconductor intraoral digital X-ray sensors.

Authors:  Sorin Teich; Wisam Al-Rawi; Masahiro Heima; Fady F Faddoul; Gil Goldzweig; Zvi Gutmacher; Dror Aizenbud
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2016-04-22       Impact factor: 2.607

7.  Brazilian young dental practitioners' use and acceptance of digital radiographic examinations.

Authors:  Karla Rovaris; Karla de Faria Vasconcelos; Eduarda Helena Leandro do Nascimento; Matheus Lima Oliveira; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Francisco Haiter-Neto
Journal:  Imaging Sci Dent       Date:  2016-12-20

8.  Knowledge, Attitude, and Practice towards Digital Imaging and Cone Beam Computed Tomography among Dental Practitioners in North Karnataka, India.

Authors:  Sudarshan Kumar Chinna; Nannuri Pranavi Reddy; Yekula Thapaswini; Akhila Muppidi; Sai Vinith Pattepu; Priyadarshini Sharma
Journal:  J Pharm Bioallied Sci       Date:  2021-11-10

9.  Radiographic imaging in relation to the mandibular third molar: a survey among oral surgeons in Sweden.

Authors:  Josefine Cederhag; Anna Truedsson; Per Alstergren; Xie-Qi Shi; Kristina Hellén-Halme
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.573

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.