Literature DB >> 11681395

The harmonic-to-noise ratio applied to dog barks.

T Riede1, H Herzel, K Hammerschmidt, L Brunnberg, G Tembrock.   

Abstract

Dog barks are typically a mixture of regular components and irregular (noisy) components. The regular part of the signal is given by a series of harmonics and is most probably due to regular vibrations of the vocal folds, whereas noise refers to any nonharmonic (irregular) energy in the spectrum of the bark signal. The noise components might be due to chaotic vibrations of the vocal-fold tissue or due to turbulence of the air. The ratio of harmonic to nonharmonic energy in dog barks is quantified by applying the harmonics-to-noise ratio (HNR). Barks of a single dog breed were recorded in the same behavioral context. Two groups of dogs were considered: a group of ten healthy dogs (the normal sample), and a group of ten unhealthy dogs, i.e., dogs treated in a veterinary clinic (the clinic sample). Although the unhealthy dogs had no voice disease, differences in emotion or pain or impacts of surgery might have influenced their barks. The barks of the dogs were recorded for a period of 6 months. The HNR computation is based on the Fourier spectrum of a 50-ms section from the middle of the bark. A 10-point moving average curve of the spectrum on a logarithmic scale is considered as estimator of the noise level in the bark, and the maximum difference of the original spectrum and the moving average is defined as the HNR measure. It is shown that a reasonable ranking of the voices is achievable based on the measurement of the HNR. The HNR-based classification is found to be consistent with perceptual evaluation of the barks. In addition, a multiparametric approach confirms the classification based on the HNR. Hence, it may be concluded that the HNR might be useful as a novel parameter in bioacoustics for quantifying the noise within a signal.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11681395     DOI: 10.1121/1.1398052

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  14 in total

1.  Humans mimicking animals: a cortical hierarchy for human vocal communication sounds.

Authors:  William J Talkington; Kristina M Rapuano; Laura A Hitt; Chris A Frum; James W Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2012-06-06       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Neural responses elicited to face motion and vocalization pairings.

Authors:  Aina Puce; James A Epling; James C Thompson; Olivia K Carrick
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

3.  Singing of Neoconocephalus robustus as an example of deterministic chaos in insects.

Authors:  Tina P Benko; Matjaz Perc
Journal:  J Biosci       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 1.826

Review 4.  Auditory object perception: A neurobiological model and prospective review.

Authors:  Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis; James W Lewis
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-04-30       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Scared and less noisy: glucocorticoids are associated with alarm call entropy.

Authors:  Daniel T Blumstein; Yvonne Y Chi
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2011-10-05       Impact factor: 3.703

6.  Distinct cortical pathways for processing tool versus animal sounds.

Authors:  James W Lewis; Julie A Brefczynski; Raymond E Phinney; John J Janik; Edgar A DeYoe
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2005-05-25       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 7.  From Soundwave to Soundscape: A Guide to Acoustic Research in Captive Animal Environments.

Authors:  Fay E Clark; Jacob C Dunn
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2022-06-16

8.  Human cortical organization for processing vocalizations indicates representation of harmonic structure as a signal attribute.

Authors:  James W Lewis; William J Talkington; Nathan A Walker; George A Spirou; Audrey Jajosky; Chris Frum; Julie A Brefczynski-Lewis
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  The gradual vocal responses to human-provoked discomfort in farmed silver foxes.

Authors:  Svetlana S Gogoleva; Elena V Volodina; Ilya A Volodin; Anastasia V Kharlamova; Lyudmila N Trut
Journal:  Acta Ethol       Date:  2010-05-11       Impact factor: 1.231

10.  Experiments on Analysing Voice Production: Excised (Human, Animal) and In Vivo (Animal) Approaches.

Authors:  Michael Döllinger; James Kobler; David A Berry; Daryush D Mehta; Georg Luegmair; Christopher Bohr
Journal:  Curr Bioinform       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 3.543

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.