Literature DB >> 11679990

Temporary portocaval shunt during liver transplantation with vena cava preservation. Results of a prospective randomized study.

J Figueras1, L Llado, E Ramos, E Jaurrieta, A Rafecas, J Fabregat, J Torras, A Sabate, A Dalmau.   

Abstract

This study aims to determine whether the use of a temporary portocaval shunt (PCS) improves hemodynamic and metabolic evolution during orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT). Preservation of the vena cava during OLT has gained wide acceptance. However, benefits of adding a temporary PCS to the piggyback technique during the anhepatic phase in patients with cirrhosis have not been shown. Eighty patients with cirrhosis were studied prospectively. They were randomly distributed into two groups: patients with a temporary PCS (n = 40) and those without a PCS (n = 40). In all cases, the piggyback technique was used. Hemodynamic profiles and biochemical data during OLT and clinical evolution after OLT were evaluated. Preoperative data were similar in both groups. Surgical time also was similar (403 +/- 77 v 387 +/- 56 minutes; P = .3). Red blood cell requirements were lower in the PCS group (2.3 +/- 2.5 v 3.3 +/- 2.9 units), although differences were not significant. In the PCS group, 45% of patients did not need red blood cell transfusion, whereas in the other group, only 22% were not administered a transfusion (P = .03). During the anhepatic phase, the decrease in cardiac output was lower in the PCS group (-9.6% v -19%; P = .05), whereas diuresis during the anhepatic phase was greater in the PCS group (3.6 +/- 2.97 v 2.1 +/- 1.38 mL/kg/h; P = .005). There were no differences in liver biochemical parameters during the first 3 postoperative days. Nevertheless, creatinine levels increased significantly during this period only in the no-PCS group. The use of a temporary PCS during OLT improves hemodynamic status, reduces intraoperative transfusion requirements, and preserves renal function during and after OLT.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679990     DOI: 10.1053/jlts.2001.27870

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Liver Transpl        ISSN: 1527-6465            Impact factor:   5.799


  10 in total

Review 1.  Strategies to optimize the use of marginal donors in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Daniele Pezzati; Davide Ghinolfi; Paolo De Simone; Emanuele Balzano; Franco Filipponi
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-11-18

2.  Techniques of orthotopic liver transplantation.

Authors:  L Lladó; J Figueras
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.647

3.  The need for venovenous bypass in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Hamidreza Fonouni; Arianeb Mehrabi; Mehrdad Soleimani; Sascha A Müller; Markus W Büchler; Jan Schmidt
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 4.  Temporary Intraoperative Porto-Caval Shunts in Piggy-Back Liver Transplantation Reduce Intraoperative Blood Loss and Improve Postoperative Transaminases and Renal Function: A Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Sebastian Pratschke; Alexandra Rauch; Markus Albertsmeier; Markus Rentsch; Michaela Kirschneck; Joachim Andrassy; Michael Thomas; Werner Hartwig; Joan Figueras; Juan Del Rio Martin; Nicola De Ruvo; Jens Werner; Markus Guba; Maximilian Weniger; Martin K Angele
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 5.  Acute kidney injury and post-reperfusion syndrome in liver transplantation.

Authors:  Ilaria Umbro; Francesca Tinti; Irene Scalera; Felicity Evison; Bridget Gunson; Adnan Sharif; James Ferguson; Paolo Muiesan; Anna Paola Mitterhofer
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-11-14       Impact factor: 5.742

6.  Intraoperative Surgical Portosystemic Shunt in Liver Transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas Souto Nacif; Leonardo Yuri Zanini; Vinicius Farina Sartori; Vera Kim; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Wellington Andraus; Luiz Carneiro D'Albuquerque
Journal:  Ann Transplant       Date:  2018-10-16       Impact factor: 1.530

Review 7.  Identifying the Superior Reperfusion Technique in Liver Transplantation: A Network Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Yao Yao; Ping Wu; Tao Guo
Journal:  Gastroenterol Res Pract       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 2.260

8.  Portal vein surgical treatment on non-tumoral portal vein thrombosis in liver transplantation: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Lucas S Nacif; Leonardo Y Zanini; Rafael S Pinheiro; Daniel R Waisberg; Vinicius Rocha-Santos; Wellington Andraus; Flair J Carrilho; Luiz Carneiro-D'Albuquerque
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 2.365

9.  Extracorporeal hepatic resection and autotransplantation using temporary portocaval shunt provides an improved solution for conventionally unresectable HCC.

Authors:  Pei-Hung Wen; Kuo-Hua Lin; Yao-Li Chen; Chia-En Hsieh; Chih-Jan Ko; Shou-Jen Kuo
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2013-08-06       Impact factor: 3.199

10.  Fast-Track Liver Transplantation: Six-year Prospective Cohort Study with an Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) Protocol.

Authors:  Gonzalo P Rodríguez-Laiz; Paola Melgar-Requena; Cándido F Alcázar-López; Mariano Franco-Campello; Celia Villodre-Tudela; Sonia Pascual-Bartolomé; Pablo Bellot-García; María Rodríguez-Soler; Cayetano F Miralles-Maciá; Patricio Más-Serrano; José A Navarro-Martínez; Francisco J Martínez-Adsuar; Luis Gómez-Salinas; Francisco A Jaime-Sánchez; Miguel Perdiguero-Gil; María Díaz-Cuevas; José M Palazón-Azorín; José Such-Ronda; Félix Lluís-Casajuana; José M Ramia-Ángel
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2021-02-23       Impact factor: 3.352

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.