Literature DB >> 11679907

Blastocyst versus day 2 or 3 transfer.

W B Schoolcraft1, D K Gardner.   

Abstract

The formulation of new sequential culture media, capable of supporting the development of viable human blastocysts, has reopened the discussion regarding the best day for embryo transfer following in vitro fertilization (IVF). Although several laboratories have reported overall increases in implantation rate and IVF efficiency following the transfer of blastocysts, others have failed to observe any benefit from extended culture. While culture conditions for the mammalian embryo undoubtedly have improved significantly over the past few years, relatively little attention has been paid to the quality of oocytes derived from ovarian hyperstimulation or the quality and receptivity of the endometrium following such hormonal regimes. It appears that differences in controlled ovarian hyperstimulation are among the major factors determining embryo quality and subsequent implantation. This therefore has confounded comparisons between different laboratories. In spite of this there are a growing number of reports demonstrating that the advantages of extended culture and blastocyst transfer, such as increased implantation rates, are not limited to specific groups of patients or specific etiologies. Rather, blastocyst transfer may be of benefit to the majority if not all patients attending for IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679907     DOI: 10.1055/s-2001-18045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Semin Reprod Med        ISSN: 1526-4564            Impact factor:   1.303


  6 in total

1.  GnRH antagonists may affect endometrial receptivity.

Authors:  Beth W Rackow; Harvey J Kliman; Hugh S Taylor
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 7.329

2.  Patient selection criteria for blastocyst transfers in extended embryo culture programs.

Authors:  Daniela Paes Almeida Ferreira Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita de Cássia S Figueira; Rogério Bonassi Machado; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2012-10-11       Impact factor: 3.412

Review 3.  Cleavage-stage versus blastocyst-stage embryo transfer in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Demián Glujovsky; Andrea Marta Quinteiro Retamar; Cristian Roberto Alvarez Sedo; Agustín Ciapponi; Simone Cornelisse; Deborah Blake
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2022-05-19

4.  The importance of the cleavage stage morphology evaluation for blastocyst transfer in patients with good prognosis.

Authors:  Daniela P A F Braga; Amanda S Setti; Rita C S Figueira; Assumpto Iaconelli; Edson Borges
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2014-06-04       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Culturing surplus poor-quality embryos to blastocyst stage have positive predictive value of clinical pregnancy rate.

Authors:  Hai Bo Zhu; Zhi Hong Zhang; Elfateh Fadlalla; Rui Xue Wang; Dong Feng Geng; Rui Zhi Liu
Journal:  Iran J Reprod Med       Date:  2014-09

6.  Estimating the causal effect of embryo transfer day on clinical in vitro fertilization outcomes using propensity score matching.

Authors:  Han-Chih Hsieh; Chun-I Lee; En-Yu Lai; Jia-Ying Su; Yi-Ting Huang; Wei-Lin Zheng; Chien-Hong Chen; Chun-Chia Huang; Pin-Yao Lin; Maw-Sheng Lee; Mark Liu; Yen-Tsung Huang
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2021-08-13       Impact factor: 3.007

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.