Literature DB >> 11679866

Comparative analysis of multiple-casualty incident triage algorithms.

A Garner1, A Lee, K Harrison, C H Schultz.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We sought to retrospectively measure the accuracy of multiple-casualty incident (MCI) triage algorithms and their component physiologic variables in predicting adult patients with critical injury.
METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of 1,144 consecutive adult patients transported by ambulance and admitted to 2 trauma centers. Association between first-recorded out-of-hospital physiologic variables and a resource-based definition of severe injury appropriate to the MCI context was determined. The association between severe injury and Triage Sieve, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and CareFlight Triage was determined in the patient population.
RESULTS: Of the physiologic variables, the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale had the strongest association with severe injury, followed by systolic blood pressure. The differences between CareFlight Triage, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment were not dramatic, with sensitivities of 82% (95% confidence interval [CI] 75% to 88%), 85% (95% CI 78% to 90%), and 84% (95% CI 76% to 89%), respectively, and specificities of 96% (95% CI 94% to 97%), 86% (95% CI 84% to 88%), and 91% (95% CI 89% to 93%), respectively. Both forms of Triage Sieve were significantly poorer predictors of severe injury.
CONCLUSION: Of the physiologic variables used in the triage algorithms, the Motor Component of the Glasgow Coma Scale and systolic blood pressure had the strongest association with severe injury. CareFlight Triage, Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment, and modified Simple Triage and Rapid Treatment had similar sensitivities in predicting critical injury in designated trauma patients, but CareFlight Triage had better specificity. Because patients in a true mass casualty situation may not be completely comparable with designated trauma patients transported to emergency departments in routine circumstances, the best triage instrument in this study may not be the best in an actual MCI. These findings must be validated prospectively before their accuracy can be confirmed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679866     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.119053

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  51 in total

1.  Portable ultrasonography in mass casualty incidents: The CAVEAT examination.

Authors:  Stanislaw Peter Stawicki; James M Howard; John P Pryor; David P Bahner; Melissa L Whitmill; Anthony J Dean
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2010-11-18

2.  Bombings specific triage (Bost Tool) tool and its application by healthcare professionals.

Authors:  Jaiswal Sanjay; Verma Ankur; Kole Tamorish
Journal:  World J Emerg Med       Date:  2015

3.  Development of a triage protocol for critical care during an influenza pandemic.

Authors:  Michael D Christian; Laura Hawryluck; Randy S Wax; Tim Cook; Neil M Lazar; Margaret S Herridge; Matthew P Muller; Douglas R Gowans; Wendy Fortier; Frederick M Burkle
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-11-21       Impact factor: 8.262

4.  A wireless first responder handheld device for rapid triage, patient assessment and documentation during mass casualty incidents.

Authors:  James P Killeen; Theodore C Chan; Colleen Buono; William G Griswold; Leslie A Lenert
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2006

5.  Validation of the Paediatric Triage Tape.

Authors:  L A Wallis; S Carley
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 2.740

6.  [Diagnostic quality of triage algorithms for mass casualty incidents].

Authors:  A R Heller; N Salvador; M Frank; J Schiffner; R Kipke; C Kleber
Journal:  Anaesthesist       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 1.041

7.  A procedure based alternative to the injury severity score for major incident triage of children: results of a Delphi consensus process.

Authors:  L Wallis; S Carley; C T Hodgetts
Journal:  Emerg Med J       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 2.740

8.  Evaluation of a CT triage protocol for mass casualty incidents: results from two large-scale exercises.

Authors:  Markus Körner; Michael M Krötz; Stefan Wirth; Stefan Huber-Wagner; Karl-Georg Kanz; Holger F Boehm; Maximilian Reiser; Ulrich Linsenmaier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Prehospital triage for mass casualty incidents using the META method for early surgical assessment: retrospective validation of a hospital trauma registry.

Authors:  Rodolfo Romero Pareja; Rafael Castro Delgado; Fernando Turégano Fuentes; Israel Jhon Thissard-Vasallo; David Sanz Rosa; Pedro Arcos González
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2018-11-07       Impact factor: 3.693

Review 10.  A review of the literature on the validity of mass casualty triage systems with a focus on chemical exposures.

Authors:  Joan M Culley; Erik Svendsen
Journal:  Am J Disaster Med       Date:  2014
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.