Literature DB >> 11679861

Comparison of test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points.

R L Lammers1, S Gibson, D Kovacs, W Sears, G Strachan.   

Abstract

STUDY
OBJECTIVE: We compare the test characteristics of urine dipstick and urinalysis at various test cutoff points in women presenting to emergency departments and an intermediate care center with symptoms of urinary tract infection.
METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study of adult women presenting to 1 of 2 community hospital EDs or an intermediate care center with dysuria, urgency, or urinary frequency on history, or suprapubic or costovertebral angle tenderness on examination. Patients who had taken antibiotics in the past 72 hours, had indwelling Foley catheters, symptomatic vaginal discharge, diabetes mellitus, immunodeficiency disorders, or were unable to provide a reliable history were excluded. The patient's clean-catch or catheterized urine specimen was tested immediately by a nurse using a Multistix 9 SG reagent strip. A second aliquot was sent within 1 hour of collection to the hospital laboratory, where a semiautomated microscopic urinalysis and a urine culture were performed. A positive urine culture was defined as more than 100,000 colonies of 1 or 2 uropathogenic bacteria per mL of urine at 48 hours. Dipstick and urinalysis data were compared with urine culture results. Sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values were calculated at various definitions of a positive test, or "test cutoff points," for combinations of leukocyte esterase, nitrite, and blood on dipstick and for RBCs and WBCs on urinalyses. The probability of an erroneous decision to withhold treatment on the basis of a negative test result was defined as "undertreatment," or 1 minus the negative predictive value. "Overtreatment" was defined as 1 minus the positive predictive value.
RESULTS: Three hundred forty-three patients were enrolled in this study. Twelve patients were withdrawn because of missing laboratory results. Forty-six percent (152/331) of patients had positive urine cultures. If urine dipstick results are defined as positive when leukocyte esterase or nitrite is positive or blood is more than trace, the overtreatment rate is 47% (156/331) and the undertreatment rate is 13% (43/331). If urinalysis results are defined as positive when WBCs are more than 3 per high-power field or RBCs are more than 5 per high-power field, the overtreatment rate is 44% (146/331) and the undertreatment rate is 11% (36/331). Matched pairs of test characteristics were identified when the analysis was repeated using more than 10,000 colonies per mL as a positive culture.
CONCLUSION: In this patient population, similar overtreatment and undertreatment rates were identified for various test cutoff points for urine dipstick tests and urinalysis. Although a urine dipstick may be equivalent to a urinalysis for the diagnosis of urinary tract infection, the limitations in the diagnostic accuracy of both tests should be incorporated into medical decisionmaking.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679861     DOI: 10.1067/mem.2001.119427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Emerg Med        ISSN: 0196-0644            Impact factor:   5.721


  20 in total

1.  Bacteriuria screening by automated whole-field-image-based microscopy reduces the number of necessary urine cultures.

Authors:  Rosanna Falbo; M Roberta Sala; Silvia Signorelli; Natascia Venturi; Stefano Signorini; Paolo Brambilla
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2012-01-11       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 2.  Best practice in primary care pathology: review 2.

Authors:  W S Smellie; J O Forth; C A M McNulty; L Hirschowitz; D Lilic; R Gosling; D Bareford; E Logan; K G Kerr; G P Spickett; J Hoffman; A Galloway; C A Bloxham
Journal:  J Clin Pathol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Usefulness of urine dipstick in an urogynecologic population.

Authors:  Fareesa Raza-Khan; Kim Kenton; Susan Shott; Linda Brubaker
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct       Date:  2006-01-12

4.  Performance of a New Rapid Immunoassay Test Kit for Point-of-Care Diagnosis of Significant Bacteriuria.

Authors:  Ann E Stapleton; Marsha E Cox; Robert K DiNello; Mark Geisberg; April Abbott; Pacita L Roberts; Thomas M Hooton
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-06-10       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  Urine Culture in Uncomplicated UTI: Interpretation and Significance.

Authors:  Ann E Stapleton
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 3.725

Review 6.  New and developing diagnostic technologies for urinary tract infections.

Authors:  Michael Davenport; Kathleen E Mach; Linda M Dairiki Shortliffe; Niaz Banaei; Tza-Huei Wang; Joseph C Liao
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 14.432

7.  A Prospective, Observational Pilot Study of the Use of Urinary Antimicrobial Peptides in Diagnosing Emergency Department Patients With Positive Urine Cultures.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Caterino; David S Hains; Carlos A Camargo; Sadeq A Quraishi; Vijay Saxena; Andrew L Schwaderer
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2015-09-16       Impact factor: 3.451

8.  Rapid and sensitive detection of major uropathogens in a single-pot multiplex PCR assay.

Authors:  B Padmavathy; R Vinoth Kumar; Amee Patel; S Deepika Swarnam; T Vaidehi; B M Jaffar Ali
Journal:  Curr Microbiol       Date:  2012-04-22       Impact factor: 2.188

9.  Point-Counterpoint: Reflex Cultures Reduce Laboratory Workload and Improve Antimicrobial Stewardship in Patients Suspected of Having Urinary Tract Infections.

Authors:  Romney M Humphries; Jennifer Dien Bard
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 5.948

10.  Urinary symptoms in adolescent females: STI or UTI?

Authors:  Jill S Huppert; Frank Biro; Dongmei Lan; Joel E Mortensen; Jennifer Reed; Gail B Slap
Journal:  J Adolesc Health       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 5.012

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.