Literature DB >> 11679601

Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a long-term follow-up study.

N Tanaka1, H Kudo, K Iwano, H Sakahashi, E Sato, S Ishii.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Improvements in the design of total elbow prostheses over the last two decades have led to better and more consistent results. The type-3 Kudo total elbow prosthesis was developed in 1980. The long-term results of use of this implant have not been reported. Because it is an unlinked prosthesis, it is not known whether preservation of the anterior oblique component of the ulnar collateral ligament at the time of implantation is important.
METHODS: A type-3 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty with cement was performed in forty-seven patients (fifty elbows) with rheumatoid arthritis. Revision rates, clinical symptoms, postoperative complications, and radiographic changes were assessed eleven to sixteen years (mean, thirteen years) postoperatively.
RESULTS: The overall survival rate of the prosthesis was 90% at sixteen years. The mean Mayo elbow performance scores were all poor (mean overall score, 43 points) initially. The overall score was substantially improved at both the intermediate follow-up examination (four to six years after the operation) and the late follow-up examination (eleven to sixteen years after the operation), to 81 and 77 points, respectively. The overall rate of radiolucency about the humeral component was 45% at the intermediate follow-up examination and 100% at the long-term follow-up examination. The rate of radiolucency about the ulnar component at the intermediate and late follow-up examinations was 4.3% and 8.9%, respectively. No great differences in results were found with preservation of the anterior oblique component of the ulnar collateral ligament.
CONCLUSIONS: This long-term follow-up study showed acceptable results of the type-3 Kudo total elbow arthroplasty in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Preservation of the ulnar collateral ligament does not seem to be necessary when performing this procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11679601     DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200110000-00008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  7 in total

1.  Total elbow arthroplasty with the Kudo prosthesis.

Authors:  R Reinhard; M van der Hoeven; M J de Vos; D Eygendaal
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-07-17       Impact factor: 3.075

2.  In vivo three-dimensional kinematics of total elbow arthroplasty using fluoroscopic imaging.

Authors:  Kazuma Futai; Tetsuya Tomita; Takaharu Yamazaki; Tsuyoshi Murase; Hideki Yoshikawa; Kazuomi Sugamoto
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-02-23       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  What design and material factors impact the wear and corrosion performance in total elbow arthroplasties?

Authors:  Mark P Figgie; Timothy M Wright; Denise Drinkwater
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.176

Review 4.  [Dislocation after total elbow arthroplasty].

Authors:  M John; K Schenk; S Lieske; H W Neumann
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 5.  Systematic review of primary total elbow prostheses used for the rheumatoid elbow.

Authors:  J C T van der Lugt; P M Rozing
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2004-04-16       Impact factor: 2.980

6.  Long-term results of the iBP elbow prosthesis: beware of destructive metallosis!

Authors:  Daniëlle Meijering; Alexander L Boerboom; Fred Breukelman; Denise Eygendaal; Sjoerd K Bulstra; Martin Stevens
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2019-09-06       Impact factor: 2.362

7.  Primary total elbow arthroplasty.

Authors:  Suresh Kumar; Sunayan Mahanta
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 1.251

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.