Literature DB >> 11677702

Needs assessment of women with urinary incontinence in a district health authority.

K MacKay1, L Hemmett.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of urinary incontinence in women is difficult to estimate because definitions vary between researchers and among women, for whom thresholds of complaint differ. However, studies have also shown that only about a quarter of women affected by urinary incontinence consult a doctor for their symptoms, despite evidence of effective treatments and better management of the condition in primary care. AIM: To assess the perceived needs of women with urinary incontinence living at home.
DESIGN: Cross-sectional community survey.
SETTING: A 1% stratified random sample of women living at home, registered with a local GP, and aged 45 years and over (n = 720) in a north London district health authority with a total population of 308,000.
RESULTS: Out of 720 questionnaires, 489 were returned completed (68%). A total of 227 (46%) women had symptoms of significant urinary incontinence. Seventy-eight (16%) had significant symptoms which they said were not a problem, and 149 (30%) of the total number of responders acknowledged that they had significant symptoms and that these symptoms were a problem for them; of these, 48 (32%) sought help from their GP; 16 out of the 48 consulting their GP were happy with the treatment given, and the remaining 101 women who considered their incontinence to be a problem had not consulted their GP and 76 of those had also not told anyone else that they had a problem. The commonest reasons given by the 101 women who admitted having a problem and who had not consulted their GPs were that they thought that they should cope on their own (43 [42.6%]), that incontinence was inevitable with age (26 [25.7%]) or that it was embarrassing to talk about the problem to their GP (14 [13.8%]).
CONCLUSIONS: Despite the existence of effective interventions for urinary incontinence, many women who are incontinent do not seek help even when they perceive their incontinence to be a problem. Half of the women who did consult their GP did not find the treatment offered helpful. Achieving health gain for women with urinary incontinence will require a more active approach than currently exists to inform people that better care is available, to help counteract the stigma attached to the problem, and to ensure that primary care professionals are able to provide effective services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11677702      PMCID: PMC1314124     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Gen Pract        ISSN: 0960-1643            Impact factor:   5.386


  22 in total

Review 1.  Regular review: management of urinary incontinence in women.

Authors:  R Thakar; S Stanton
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-11-25

2.  Rectal bleeding: prevalence and consultation behaviour.

Authors:  A Crosland; R Jones
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1995-08-19

3.  Urinary incontinence. GPs lack confidence.

Authors:  J V Jolleys; J V Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-15

4.  Urinary incontinence in Northern Ireland: a prevalence study.

Authors:  L M Dolan; K Casson; P McDonald; R G Ashe
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.588

5.  Urinary incontinence in the community--analysis of a MORI poll.

Authors:  J C Brocklehurst
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-03-27

6.  Estrogen therapy in the management of urinary incontinence in postmenopausal women: a meta-analysis. First report of the Hormones and Urogenital Therapy Committee.

Authors:  J A Fantl; L Cardozo; D K McClish
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1994-01       Impact factor: 7.661

7.  Experience with bladder training in 65 patients.

Authors:  B G Ferrie; J S Smith; D Logan; R Lyle; P J Paterson
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1984-10

8.  Pelvic physiotherapy in genuine stress incontinence.

Authors:  H Cammu; M Van Nylen; M P Derde; R DeBruyne; J J Amy
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1991-10       Impact factor: 2.649

9.  Female urinary incontinence--consultation behaviour and patient experiences: an epidemiological survey in a Norwegian community.

Authors:  A Seim; H Sandvik; R Hermstad; S Hunskaar
Journal:  Fam Pract       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 2.267

10.  Urinary incontinence: prevalence, need for treatment, and effectiveness of intervention by nurse.

Authors:  J O'Brien; M Austin; P Sethi; P O'Boyle
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-11-23
View more
  5 in total

1.  Unreported urinary incontinence: population-based prevalence and factors associated with non-reporting of symptoms in community-dwelling people ≥ 50 years.

Authors:  Rachel Sullivan; Triona McNicholas; Paul Claffey; Rose Anne Kenny; Robert Briggs
Journal:  Eur Geriatr Med       Date:  2020-10-07       Impact factor: 1.710

Review 2.  Nonbiologic factors that impact management in women with urinary incontinence: review of the literature and findings from a National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases workshop.

Authors:  Jenna M Norton; Jennifer L Dodson; Diane K Newman; Rebecca G Rogers; Andrea D Fairman; Helen L Coons; Robert A Star; Tamara G Bavendam
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-07-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Internet-based treatment of stress urinary incontinence: a randomised controlled study with focus on pelvic floor muscle training.

Authors:  Malin Sjöström; Göran Umefjord; Hans Stenlund; Per Carlbring; Gerhard Andersson; Eva Samuelsson
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 5.588

Review 4.  Social, economic, and health utility considerations in the treatment of overactive bladder.

Authors:  Emilio Sacco; Daniele Tienforti; Alessandro D'Addessi; Francesco Pinto; Marco Racioppi; Angelo Totaro; Daniele D'Agostino; Francesco Marangi; Pierfrancesco Bassi
Journal:  Open Access J Urol       Date:  2010-02-11

5.  A Community-Based Education Program for Overactive Bladder in a Predominantly Minority Older Female Population: A Pilot Study.

Authors:  Susana Martinez Díaz; Hudson Pierce; John Richard Lee; Tirsit Asfaw; Andrew Abram; Naeem Bhojani; Dean Elterman; Kevin Zorn; Bilal Chughtai
Journal:  Urol Int       Date:  2022-03-23       Impact factor: 1.934

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.