Literature DB >> 11677476

Diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens: comparison between a conventional biopsy forceps and multibite forceps.

A C Fantin1, J Neuweiler, J S Binek, W R Suter, C Meyenberger.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The endoscopic biopsy is a prerequisite for histopathologic diagnosis. Various types of forceps are used to obtain tissue specimens. The aim of this study was to assess and compare the diagnostic quality of biopsy specimens obtained with a conventional forceps and a Multibite forceps.
METHODS: In a prospective, partially blinded, and randomized trial that included 250 patients referred for diagnostic upper and/or lower endoscopy, 510 biopsy specimens obtained with the Multibite forceps were compared with 520 specimens obtained with a conventional forceps. An experienced, blinded pathologist evaluated the specimens for diameter, depth of specimen, artifacts, anatomic orientation, vitality, general histologic quality, and diagnostic quality. Statistical analysis was performed by using the Fisher exact test. A p value of < 0.05 was regarded as significant.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the specimens obtained with the 2 forceps. The p values for the evaluated parameters were as follows: diameter 0.45, depth of specimen 0.56, artifacts 1.0, pathoanatomic orientation 0.40, vitality 0.45, and histologic diagnostic quality 0.53.
CONCLUSION: The quality of biopsy specimens obtained with the Multibite forceps is comparable with that of specimens taken with a conventional forceps. Use of the Multibite forceps saves time in that 4 specimens can be obtained in 1 pass in situations in which a large number of specimens are needed or when the potential for transmission of infection is of concern.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11677476     DOI: 10.1067/mge.2001.118945

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc        ISSN: 0016-5107            Impact factor:   9.427


  6 in total

1.  One bite or two? A prospective trial comparing colonoscopy biopsy technique in patients with chronic ulcerative colitis.

Authors:  Lawrence C Hookey; David J Hurlbut; Andrew G Day; Paul N Manley; William T Depew
Journal:  Can J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.522

2.  The histological quality and adequacy of diminutive colorectal polyps resected using jumbo versus hot biopsy forceps.

Authors:  Bulent Yasar; Huseyin Kayadibi; Evren Abut; Dilek Benek; Koray Kochan; Can Gonen
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2014-08-12       Impact factor: 3.199

3.  Prospective, randomized, pathologist-blinded study of disposable alligator-jaw biopsy forceps for gastric mucosal biopsy.

Authors:  S Abudayyeh; J Hoffman; H T El-Zimaity; D Y Graham
Journal:  Dig Liver Dis       Date:  2008-09-16       Impact factor: 4.088

4.  Single-bite versus double-bite technique for mapping biopsies during endoscopic surveillance for hereditary diffuse gastric cancer: a single-center, randomized trial.

Authors:  Apostolos Pappas; Wei Keith Tan; William Waldock; Susan Richardson; Monika Tripathi; Wladyslaw Januszewicz; Geoffrey Roberts; Maria O'Donovan; Rebecca C Fitzgerald; Massimiliano di Pietro
Journal:  Endoscopy       Date:  2020-07-17       Impact factor: 10.093

5.  Comparison of 3 Handling Techniques for Endoscopically Obtained Gastric and Duodenal Biopsy Specimens: A Prospective Study in Dogs and Cats.

Authors:  G C Ruiz; E Reyes-Gomez; E J Hall; V Freiche
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2016-07-11       Impact factor: 3.333

6.  Comparison of 2 differently sized endoscopic biopsy forceps in the evaluation of intestinal disease in cats.

Authors:  Enrico Bottero; Emanuele Mussi; Camillo Pieramati; Davide De Lorenzi; Serenella Silvestri; Elvio Lepri
Journal:  J Vet Intern Med       Date:  2018-12-17       Impact factor: 3.333

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.