Literature DB >> 11677102

Reduced utilisation of specialist care among elderly cancer patients: a randomised study of a primary healthcare intervention.

B Johansson1, L Holmberg, G Berglund, Y Brandberg, M Hellbom, C Persson, B Glimelius, P O Sjödén.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of an individual support (IS) intervention including intensified primary healthcare on the utilisation of specialist care among cancer patients, and to investigate if such an effect was modified by the patient's age (less than 70 years or 70 years and more). Newly diagnosed cancer patients (n=416) were randomised between the intervention and a control condition, and data were collected on the utilisation of specialist care within 3 months from inclusion. Intensified primary healthcare comprised extended information from the specialist clinics, and education and supervision in cancer care for general practitioners (GPs) and home-care nurses. The support given also included interventions designed to diminish problems of weight loss and psychological distress. The intervention reduced the number of admissions (NoA) and the days of hospitalisation (DoH) after adjustment for weight loss and psychological distress, but only for older patients. Older patients randomised to the intervention (n=82) experienced 393 fewer DoH than the older control patients (n=79). In addition, the proportion of older patients in the IS group who utilised acute specialist care was smaller compared with older control patients group. The conclusion is that older cancer patients' utilisation of specialist care may be reduced by intensified primary healthcare services.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11677102     DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(01)00278-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  11 in total

Review 1.  Patients' and healthcare professionals' views of cancer follow-up: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Maggie Hendry; Barbara France; Nefyn H Williams; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

Review 2.  Follow-up of cancer in primary care versus secondary care: systematic review.

Authors:  Ruth A Lewis; Richard D Neal; Nefyn H Williams; Barbara France; Maggie Hendry; Daphne Russell; Dyfrig A Hughes; Ian Russell; Nicholas S A Stuart; David Weller; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  Effects of structured involvement of the primary care team versus standard care after a cancer diagnosis on patient satisfaction and healthcare use: the GRIP randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  I A A Perfors; C W Helsper; E A Noteboom; E A Visserman; E B L van Dorst; T van Dalen; M A M T Verhagen; A J Witkamp; R Koelemij; A E Flinterman; K A B M Pruissen-Peeters; F M N H Schramel; M T M van Rens; M F Ernst; L M G Moons; E van der Wall; N J de Wit; A M May
Journal:  BMC Prim Care       Date:  2022-06-04

Review 4.  Primary Care Physicians' Perspectives of Their Role in Cancer Care: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Renae A Lawrence; Jordana K McLoone; Claire E Wakefield; Richard J Cohn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2016-05-24       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Shared care across the interface between primary and specialty care in management of long term conditions.

Authors:  Susan M Smith; Gráinne Cousins; Barbara Clyne; Shane Allwright; Tom O'Dowd
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-02-23

6.  A pilot randomised controlled trial of personalised care after treatment for prostate cancer (TOPCAT-P): nurse-led holistic-needs assessment and individualised psychoeducational intervention: study protocol.

Authors:  Marian Andrei Stanciu; Caroline Morris; Matt Makin; Eila Watson; Jenna Bulger; Richard Evans; Julia Hiscock; Zoë Hoare; Rhiannon Tudor Edwards; Richard David Neal; Clare Wilkinson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-06-25       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.

Authors:  I A A Perfors; C W Helsper; E A Noteboom; E van der Wall; N J de Wit; A M May
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-02-05       Impact factor: 4.430

8.  Use of shared care and routine tests in follow-up after treatment for localised cutaneous melanoma.

Authors:  Wei-Yin Lim; Robin M Turner; Rachael L Morton; Marisa C Jenkins; Les Irwig; Angela C Webster; Mbathio Dieng; Robyn P M Saw; Pascale Guitera; Donald Low; Cynthia Low; Katy J L Bell
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-06-20       Impact factor: 2.655

9.  Health-related quality of life and distress in cancer patients: results from a large randomised study.

Authors:  B Johansson; Y Brandberg; M Hellbom; C Persson; L-M Petersson; G Berglund; B Glimelius
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-11-18       Impact factor: 7.640

Review 10.  Workforce characteristics and interventions associated with high-quality care and support to older people with cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  Jackie Bridges; Grace Lucas; Theresa Wiseman; Peter Griffiths
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.