Literature DB >> 11676785

Static measures of calcaneal deviation and arch angle as predictors of rearfoot motion during walking.

Adrienne E Hunt1, Alexander J Fahey, Richard M Smith.   

Abstract

Clinicians commonly assess static alignment of the foot with the assumption that it is predictive of its movement during walking and the risk of injury. This study investigated the relationship between clinical measures of calcaneal deviation and medial arch angle in standing and three-dimensional rearfoot movement during the stance phase of walking in 19 young healthy males. Correlations were performed among the variables of maximum eversion, maximum abduction, the range of inversion-eversion and the range of abduction-adduction. The only significant correlation was between calcaneal deviation and maximum eversion (r = 0.46, p < 0.05). We concluded that the static measures of calcaneal deviation and medial arch angle are limited in their ability to predict three-dimensional rearfoot movement during walking in asymptomatic people.

Entities:  

Year:  2000        PMID: 11676785     DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60309-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Aust J Physiother        ISSN: 0004-9514


  9 in total

Review 1.  A biomechanical perspective: do foot orthoses work?

Authors:  B Heiderscheit; J Hamill; D Tiberio
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Sports medicine in The Netherlands.

Authors:  G C van Enst
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 13.800

3.  Relationships between foot type and dynamic rearfoot frontal plane motion.

Authors:  Vivienne H Chuter
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2010-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

4.  Segmental foot mobility in individuals with and without diabetes and neuropathy.

Authors:  Smita Rao; Charles Saltzman; H John Yack
Journal:  Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 2.063

5.  Arch height and maximum rearfoot eversion during jogging in 2 static neutral positions.

Authors:  Sae Yong Lee; Jay Hertel
Journal:  J Athl Train       Date:  2012 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.860

6.  Eight Weeks of Exercising on Sand Has Positive Effects on Biomechanics of Walking and Muscle Activities in Individuals with Pronated Feet: A Randomized Double-Blinded Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Amir Ali Jafarnezhadgero; Amir Fatollahi; Urs Granacher
Journal:  Sports (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-02

7.  Selected static foot assessments do not predict medial longitudinal arch motion during running.

Authors:  Ben Langley; Mary Cramp; Stewart C Morrison
Journal:  J Foot Ankle Res       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Differences in Pes Planus and Pes Cavus subtalar eversion/inversion before and after prolonged running, using a two-dimensional digital analysis.

Authors:  Charlotte Sinclair; Ulla Svantesson; Rita Sjöström; Marie Alricsson
Journal:  J Exerc Rehabil       Date:  2017-04-30

9.  A comparison of the free moment pattern between normal and hyper-pronated aligned feet in female subjects during the stance phase of gait.

Authors:  Yazdani F; Razeghi M; Ebrahimi S
Journal:  J Biomed Phys Eng       Date:  2020-02-01
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.