R C Plotnikoff1, S B Hotz, N J Birkett, K S Courneya. 1. Centre for Health Promotion Studies, Alberta Centre for Active Living, and Faculty of Physical Education, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, T6G 2T4, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) to predict exercise stage transition of individuals in a large, untreated-population-based, random sample of Canadian adults (18-65 years of age) over two consecutive time periods. METHODS: Assessments of TTM's stage of exercise behavior change, self-efficacy, pros, cons, experiential processes, and behavioral processes were made at baseline (time 1), 6 months (time 2), and 1 year (time 3). Six hundred eighty-three men and women, identified through random-digit telephone dialing, completed all measures across the three time points. Within each time period (time 1-2; time 2-3) participants were categorized as having regressed (moved back at least on stage), remained (no stage change), or progressed (moved forward at least one stage). Baseline TTM constructs were analyzed for their ability to predict change transition across the two time periods. RESULTS: Of 40 possible predictions (20 for each time period) 18 (45%) were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings demonstrate partial support for the internal validation of TTM in the exercise domain. Implications of the findings are discussed and future directions for researchers, practitioners, and program planners are provided. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to test the ability of the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) to predict exercise stage transition of individuals in a large, untreated-population-based, random sample of Canadian adults (18-65 years of age) over two consecutive time periods. METHODS: Assessments of TTM's stage of exercise behavior change, self-efficacy, pros, cons, experiential processes, and behavioral processes were made at baseline (time 1), 6 months (time 2), and 1 year (time 3). Six hundred eighty-three men and women, identified through random-digit telephone dialing, completed all measures across the three time points. Within each time period (time 1-2; time 2-3) participants were categorized as having regressed (moved back at least on stage), remained (no stage change), or progressed (moved forward at least one stage). Baseline TTM constructs were analyzed for their ability to predict change transition across the two time periods. RESULTS: Of 40 possible predictions (20 for each time period) 18 (45%) were supported. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, the findings demonstrate partial support for the internal validation of TTM in the exercise domain. Implications of the findings are discussed and future directions for researchers, practitioners, and program planners are provided. Copyright 2001 American Health Foundation and Academic Press.
Authors: Carol Ewing Garber; Jenifer E Allsworth; Bess H Marcus; Jana Hesser; Kate L Lapane Journal: Am J Public Health Date: 2008-04-01 Impact factor: 9.308
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Michael A Pickering; Ryan E Rhodes; Kerry S Courneya; John C Spence Journal: Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act Date: 2010-05-03 Impact factor: 6.457
Authors: Ronald C Plotnikoff; Kerry S Courneya; Ronald J Sigal; Jeffrey A Johnson; Nicholas Birkett; David Lau; Kim Raine; Steven T Johnson; Nandini Karunamuni Journal: Trials Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 2.279