Literature DB >> 11675390

Role of the helical domain in fatty acid transfer from adipocyte and heart fatty acid-binding proteins to membranes: analysis of chimeric proteins.

Heng-Ling Liou1, Peter C Kahn, Judith Storch.   

Abstract

The adipocyte and heart fatty acid-binding proteins (A- and HFABP) are members of a lipid-binding protein family with a beta-barrel body capped by a small helix-turn-helix motif. Both proteins are hypothesized to transport fatty acid (FA) to phospholipid membranes through a collisional process. Previously, we suggested that the helical domain is particularly important for the electrostatic interactions involved in this transfer mechanism (Herr, F. M., Aronson, J., and Storch, J. (1996) Biochemistry 35, 1296-1303; and Liou, H.-L., and Storch, J. (2001) Biochemistry 40, 6475-6485). Despite their using qualitatively similar FA transfer mechanisms, differences in absolute transfer rates as well as regulation of transfer from AFABP versus HFABP, prompted us to consider the structural determinants that underlie these functional disparities. To determine the specific elements underlying the functional differences between AFABP and HFABP in FA transfer, two pairs of chimeric proteins were generated. The first and second pairs had the entire helical domain and the first alpha-helix exchanged between A- and HFABP, respectively. The transfer rates of anthroyloxy-labeled fatty acid from proteins to small unilamellar vesicles were compared with the wild type AFABP and HFABP. The results suggest that the alphaII-helix is important in determining the absolute FA transfer rates. Furthermore, the alphaI-helix appears to be particularly important in regulating protein sensitivity to the negative charge of membranes. The alphaI-helix of HFABP and the alphaII-helix of AFABP increased the sensitivity to anionic vesicles; the alphaI-helix of AFABP and alphaII-helix of HFABP decreased the sensitivity. The differential sensitivities to negative charge, as well as differential absolute rates of FA transfer, may help these two proteins to function uniquely in their respective cell types.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11675390     DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M107987200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biol Chem        ISSN: 0021-9258            Impact factor:   5.157


  8 in total

Review 1.  The multigene family of fatty acid-binding proteins (FABPs): function, structure and polymorphism.

Authors:  Agata Chmurzyńska
Journal:  J Appl Genet       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 2.  Tissue-specific functions in the fatty acid-binding protein family.

Authors:  Judith Storch; Alfred E Thumser
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2010-08-17       Impact factor: 5.157

3.  A novel polymorphism in the chicken adipocyte fatty acid-binding protein gene (FABP4) that alters ligand-binding and correlates with fatness.

Authors:  Qigui Wang; Tianzhu Guan; Hui Li; David A Bernlohr
Journal:  Comp Biochem Physiol B Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  2009-07-10       Impact factor: 2.231

4.  Two fatty acid-binding proteins expressed in the intestine interact differently with endocannabinoids.

Authors:  May Poh Lai; Francine S Katz; Cédric Bernard; Judith Storch; Ruth E Stark
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2020-04-28       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  The integrity of the alpha-helical domain of intestinal fatty acid binding protein is essential for the collision-mediated transfer of fatty acids to phospholipid membranes.

Authors:  G R Franchini; J Storch; B Corsico
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2008-02-05

6.  Modeling fatty acid delivery from intestinal fatty acid binding protein to a membrane.

Authors:  Maja Mihajlovic; Themis Lazaridis
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2007-07-27       Impact factor: 6.725

7.  Circulating Adipose Fatty Acid Binding Protein Is a New Link Underlying Obesity-Associated Breast/Mammary Tumor Development.

Authors:  Jiaqing Hao; Yuwen Zhang; Xiaofang Yan; Fei Yan; Yanwen Sun; Jun Zeng; Sabine Waigel; Yanhui Yin; Mostafa M Fraig; Nejat K Egilmez; Jill Suttles; Maiying Kong; Shujun Liu; Margot P Cleary; Edward Sauter; Bing Li
Journal:  Cell Metab       Date:  2018-08-09       Impact factor: 27.287

Review 8.  The human fatty acid-binding protein family: evolutionary divergences and functions.

Authors:  Rebecca L Smathers; Dennis R Petersen
Journal:  Hum Genomics       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 4.639

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.