S Heshka1, D B Allison. 1. New York Obesity Research Center, St. Luke's/Roosevelt Hospital, Columbia University Institute of Human Nutrition, New York 10025, USA. sh311@columbia.edu
Abstract
BACKGROUND: There is disagreement about whether obesity should be considered a disease, as can be seen by inconsistent usage and the advocacy of conflicting views in popular and scholarly articles. However, neither writers who refer to obesity as a disease nor those who question whether it is a disease have generally provided a definition of disease and then offered evidence that obesity does or does not fit the definition. METHOD: The characteristics of obesity were examined to determine whether they fit the common and recurring elements of definitions of disease taken from a sample of authoritative English language dictionaries. FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) or percentage body fat in excess of some cut-off value, though clearly a threat to health and longevity, lacks a universal concomitant group of symptoms or signs and the impairment of function which characterize disease according to traditional definitions. While it might nevertheless be possible to achieve a social consensus that it is a disease despite its failure to fit traditional models of disease, the merits of such a goal are questionable. Labeling obesity a disease may be expedient but it is not a necessary step in a campaign to combat obesity and it may be interpreted as self-serving advocacy without a sound scientific basis.
BACKGROUND: There is disagreement about whether obesity should be considered a disease, as can be seen by inconsistent usage and the advocacy of conflicting views in popular and scholarly articles. However, neither writers who refer to obesity as a disease nor those who question whether it is a disease have generally provided a definition of disease and then offered evidence that obesity does or does not fit the definition. METHOD: The characteristics of obesity were examined to determine whether they fit the common and recurring elements of definitions of disease taken from a sample of authoritative English language dictionaries. FINDINGS AND INTERPRETATIONS: Obesity, defined as a body mass index (BMI, kg/m(2)) or percentage body fat in excess of some cut-off value, though clearly a threat to health and longevity, lacks a universal concomitant group of symptoms or signs and the impairment of function which characterize disease according to traditional definitions. While it might nevertheless be possible to achieve a social consensus that it is a disease despite its failure to fit traditional models of disease, the merits of such a goal are questionable. Labeling obesity a disease may be expedient but it is not a necessary step in a campaign to combat obesity and it may be interpreted as self-serving advocacy without a sound scientific basis.
Authors: Lorenzo M Donini; Riccardo Dalle Grave; Antonio Caretto; Lucio Lucchin; Nazario Melchionda; Enzo Nisoli; Paolo Sbraccia; Andrea Lenzi; Massimo Cuzzolaro Journal: Eat Weight Disord Date: 2014-01-22 Impact factor: 4.652
Authors: Magali Barbieri; Aline Désesquelles; Viviana Egidi; Elena Demuru; Luisa Frova; France Meslé; Marilena Pappagallo Journal: Int J Public Health Date: 2017-05-11 Impact factor: 3.380